On 09/06/16 16:58, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Felipe Balbi writes:
>>> However, if I comment out the phy_exit()/init(), phy_power_off/on() part
>>> then
>>> I do see the devices resume correctly.
>>
>> okay, so in some cases we don't want
On 09/06/16 16:10, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Roger Quadros writes:
>>> okay, so we actually want to power the hole thing down when in deep
>>> sleep. What does deep sleep map to in linux parlance? suspend-to-ram?
>>> suspend-to-disk?
>>
>> SoC standby == echo standby >
Hi,
Felipe Balbi writes:
>> However, if I comment out the phy_exit()/init(), phy_power_off/on() part then
>> I do see the devices resume correctly.
>
> okay, so in some cases we don't want phy_exit()/phy_init(), I can move
> that elsewhere. Let me check.
wait a
Hi,
Roger Quadros writes:
>> okay, so we actually want to power the hole thing down when in deep
>> sleep. What does deep sleep map to in linux parlance? suspend-to-ram?
>> suspend-to-disk?
>
> SoC standby == echo standby > /sys/power/state
> SoC deepsleep == echo mem >
+Kishon,
On 09/06/16 14:50, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Roger Quadros writes:
> we're only suspending with cable detached, if you need to maintain
That's true only for device mode. What about host mode? Devices are still
connected to the host port and are
Hi,
Roger Quadros writes:
we're only suspending with cable detached, if you need to maintain
>>>
>>> That's true only for device mode. What about host mode? Devices are still
>>> connected to the host port and are most probably just suspended, not
>>> disconnected.
>>
>>
On 09/06/16 13:58, Roger Quadros wrote:
> On 09/06/16 12:27, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Roger Quadros writes:
>>> [ Unknown signature status ]
>>> On 09/06/16 11:00, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
Roger Quadros writes:
> Felipe,
>
>
On 09/06/16 12:27, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Roger Quadros writes:
>> [ Unknown signature status ]
>> On 09/06/16 11:00, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Roger Quadros writes:
Felipe,
On 30/05/16 14:34, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> now
Hi,
Roger Quadros writes:
> [ Unknown signature status ]
> On 09/06/16 11:00, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Roger Quadros writes:
>>> Felipe,
>>>
>>> On 30/05/16 14:34, Felipe Balbi wrote:
now that we have re-factored dwc3_core_init() and
On 09/06/16 11:00, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Roger Quadros writes:
>> Felipe,
>>
>> On 30/05/16 14:34, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>> now that we have re-factored dwc3_core_init() and
>>> dwc3_core_exit() we can use them for suspend/resume
>>> operations.
>>>
>>> This will help us
Hi,
Roger Quadros writes:
> Felipe,
>
> On 30/05/16 14:34, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> now that we have re-factored dwc3_core_init() and
>> dwc3_core_exit() we can use them for suspend/resume
>> operations.
>>
>> This will help us avoid some common mistakes when
>> patching code when
Felipe,
On 30/05/16 14:34, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> now that we have re-factored dwc3_core_init() and
> dwc3_core_exit() we can use them for suspend/resume
> operations.
>
> This will help us avoid some common mistakes when
> patching code when we have duplicated pieces of code
> doing the same
now that we have re-factored dwc3_core_init() and
dwc3_core_exit() we can use them for suspend/resume
operations.
This will help us avoid some common mistakes when
patching code when we have duplicated pieces of code
doing the same thing.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi
13 matches
Mail list logo