On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 4:42 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> + msleep(100);
>>
>>
>> This has to be explained.
>
>
> Erm, this comes 1:1 from Intels Android X86 patches I've no
> idea why it is there, I believe it is better to leave this
> uncommented then making something up.
The above would
Hi,
On 07-06-18 18:43, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello!
On 06/07/2018 01:38 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
On some Bay Trail (BYT) systems the firmware does not enable the
ULPI Refclk.
This commit adds a helper which checks and if necessary enabled the Refclk
and calls this helper for BYT machines.
Hello!
On 06/07/2018 01:38 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On some Bay Trail (BYT) systems the firmware does not enable the
> ULPI Refclk.
>
> This commit adds a helper which checks and if necessary enabled the Refclk
> and calls this helper for BYT machines.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede
> ---
Hi,
On 07-06-18 15:30, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 1:38 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
On some Bay Trail (BYT) systems the firmware does not enable the
ULPI Refclk.
This commit adds a helper which checks and if necessary enabled the Refclk
and calls this helper for BYT machines.
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 1:38 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On some Bay Trail (BYT) systems the firmware does not enable the
> ULPI Refclk.
>
> This commit adds a helper which checks and if necessary enabled the Refclk
> and calls this helper for BYT machines.
> +static void
On some Bay Trail (BYT) systems the firmware does not enable the
ULPI Refclk.
This commit adds a helper which checks and if necessary enabled the Refclk
and calls this helper for BYT machines.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede
---
drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-pci.c | 34 ++
