Greg KH writes:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 06:00:04PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>> "ci13xxx" is bad for at least the following reasons:
>> * people often mistype it
>> * it doesn't add any informational value to the names it's used in
>> * it needlessly attracts mail filters
>>
>> Th
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 06:00:04PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> "ci13xxx" is bad for at least the following reasons:
> * people often mistype it
> * it doesn't add any informational value to the names it's used in
> * it needlessly attracts mail filters
>
> This patch replaces it with
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 01:20:31PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> Peter Chen writes:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 06:00:04PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> >> "ci13xxx" is bad for at least the following reasons:
> >> * people often mistype it
> >> * it doesn't add any informational v
Peter Chen writes:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 06:00:04PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>> "ci13xxx" is bad for at least the following reasons:
>> * people often mistype it
>> * it doesn't add any informational value to the names it's used in
>> * it needlessly attracts mail filters
>>
>>