Re: [PATCH 20/20] usb: chipidea: drop "13xxx" infix

2013-06-24 Thread Alexander Shishkin
Greg KH writes: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 06:00:04PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote: >> "ci13xxx" is bad for at least the following reasons: >> * people often mistype it >> * it doesn't add any informational value to the names it's used in >> * it needlessly attracts mail filters >> >> Th

Re: [PATCH 20/20] usb: chipidea: drop "13xxx" infix

2013-06-17 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 06:00:04PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > "ci13xxx" is bad for at least the following reasons: > * people often mistype it > * it doesn't add any informational value to the names it's used in > * it needlessly attracts mail filters > > This patch replaces it with

Re: [PATCH 20/20] usb: chipidea: drop "13xxx" infix

2013-06-14 Thread Michael Grzeschik
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 01:20:31PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > Peter Chen writes: > > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 06:00:04PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > >> "ci13xxx" is bad for at least the following reasons: > >> * people often mistype it > >> * it doesn't add any informational v

Re: [PATCH 20/20] usb: chipidea: drop "13xxx" infix

2013-06-14 Thread Alexander Shishkin
Peter Chen writes: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 06:00:04PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote: >> "ci13xxx" is bad for at least the following reasons: >> * people often mistype it >> * it doesn't add any informational value to the names it's used in >> * it needlessly attracts mail filters >> >>