Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/5] USB: serial: cp210x: Made sure SERIAL_XOFF_CONTINUE flag is clear.

2016-04-25 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. On 4/24/2016 8:09 PM, Konstantin Shkolnyy wrote: The CRTCTS flag code intended to clear the SERIAL_XOFF_CONTINUE flag, but CRTSCTS? Also, "is" missing before "intended"? did it inconsistently. This change is non-functional for existing chips because the driver never set the flag a

Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/5] USB: serial: cp210x: Made sure SERIAL_XOFF_CONTINUE flag is clear.

2016-04-25 Thread Johan Hovold
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 12:09:10PM -0500, Konstantin Shkolnyy wrote: > The CRTCTS flag code intended to clear the SERIAL_XOFF_CONTINUE flag, but > did it inconsistently. This change is non-functional for existing chips > because the driver never set the flag and it's clear by default. > > Signed-o

[PATCH RESEND 2/5] USB: serial: cp210x: Made sure SERIAL_XOFF_CONTINUE flag is clear.

2016-04-24 Thread Konstantin Shkolnyy
The CRTCTS flag code intended to clear the SERIAL_XOFF_CONTINUE flag, but did it inconsistently. This change is non-functional for existing chips because the driver never set the flag and it's clear by default. Signed-off-by: Konstantin Shkolnyy --- drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c | 2 +- 1 file cha