This patch introduces a new NCM tx engine, able to operate in standard-
and huawei-style mode.
In the first case, the NDP is disposed after the initial headers and
before any datagram.
What works:
- is able to communicate with compliant NCM devices:
I tested this with a board running the L
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 00:32 +0200, Enrico Mioso wrote:
> This patch introduces a new NCM tx engine, able to operate in standard-
> and huawei-style mode.
> In the first case, the NDP is disposed after the initial headers and
> before any datagram.
>
> What works:
> - is able to communicate with co
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 00:32 +0200, Enrico Mioso wrote:
> +/* XXX rewrite, not multipacket */
Can you explain what you want to do here?
> +struct sk_buff *
> +huawei_ncm_tx_fixup(struct usbnet *dev, struct sk_buff *skb_in, gfp_t flags)
> {
> + struct huawei_cdc_ncm_state *drvstate = (void *)&
: introduce new TX ncm stack
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 00:32 +0200, Enrico Mioso wrote:
This patch introduces a new NCM tx engine, able to operate in standard-
and huawei-style mode.
In the first case, the NDP is disposed after the initial headers and
before any datagram.
What works:
- is able to
On Thu, 2015-06-25 at 13:44 +0200, Enrico Mioso wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2015, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Is there any advantage in keeping this in a single function?
> >
> I did this choice in the light of the fact I think the tx_fixup function will
> become more complex than it is now, when aggre
...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] 2/2 huawei_cdc_ncm: introduce new TX ncm stack
On Thu, 2015-06-25 at 13:44 +0200, Enrico Mioso wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Is there any advantage in keeping this in a single function?
I did this choice in the light of the fact I think
Jun 2015 15:38:46
> > From: Oliver Neukum
> > To: Enrico Mioso
> > Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, net...@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] 2/2 huawei_cdc_ncm: introduce new TX ncm stack
> >
> > On Thu, 2015-06-25 at 13:44 +0200, Enrico Mioso wrote:
: Oliver Neukum
To: Enrico Mioso
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, net...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] 2/2 huawei_cdc_ncm: introduce new TX ncm stack
On Thu, 2015-06-25 at 13:44 +0200, Enrico Mioso wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Is there any advantage in keeping this in
Ok, for now I should let go of this - might be it was a little bit too much for
the time constaints I am having.
But thank you for your effort Oliver.
Anyway, trying to write this new TX engine helped me in understand better
things and conceive the patch I sent you affecting cdc_ncm.c, which tri
