This patch series adds support for early printk through USB3 debug port.
USB3 debug port is described in xHCI specification as an optional extended
capability.
The first patch adds a file in sysfs, through which users can check
whether the debug capability is supported by a specific host controlle
Hi,
On 11/09/15 at 03:38pm, Lu Baolu wrote:
> This patch series adds support for early printk through USB3 debug port.
> USB3 debug port is described in xHCI specification as an optional extended
> capability.
>
I did a test with your previous patchset with the manually wired cable.
debug host d
On 11/10/2015 05:39 PM, Dave Young wrote:
Hi,
On 11/09/15 at 03:38pm, Lu Baolu wrote:
This patch series adds support for early printk through USB3 debug port.
USB3 debug port is described in xHCI specification as an optional extended
capability.
I did a test with your previous patchset with
Hi,
On 11/11/15 at 09:32am, Lu, Baolu wrote:
>
>
> On 11/10/2015 05:39 PM, Dave Young wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On 11/09/15 at 03:38pm, Lu Baolu wrote:
> >>This patch series adds support for early printk through USB3 debug port.
> >>USB3 debug port is described in xHCI specification as an optional ex
On 11/11/2015 10:25 AM, Dave Young wrote:
Hi,
On 11/11/15 at 09:32am, Lu, Baolu wrote:
On 11/10/2015 05:39 PM, Dave Young wrote:
Hi,
On 11/09/15 at 03:38pm, Lu Baolu wrote:
This patch series adds support for early printk through USB3 debug port.
USB3 debug port is described in xHCI specif
On 11/11/2015 10:25 AM, Dave Young wrote:
[ 1616.823351] usb 2-2: new SuperSpeed USB device number 8 using xhci_hcd
[ 1616.834520] usb 2-2: LPM exit latency is zeroed, disabling LPM.
[ 1616.834856] usb 2-2: New USB device found, idVendor=1d6b, idProduct=0004
[ 1616.834858] usb 2-2: New USB devi
Hi Dave,
Which device are you testing with? This implementation was developed
and tested on Intel Skylake devices.
It doesn't surprise me if it doesn't work with other silicons. But it do
remind me to create a verified-list and put those known-to-work devices
in it.
Thanks,
Baolu
On 11/11/2015
Hi, Baolu
On 11/12/15 at 10:45am, Lu, Baolu wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Which device are you testing with? This implementation was developed
> and tested on Intel Skylake devices.
>
> It doesn't surprise me if it doesn't work with other silicons. But it do
> remind me to create a verified-list and put
Hi Dave,
On 11/12/2015 02:01 PM, Dave Young wrote:
Hi, Baolu
On 11/12/15 at 10:45am, Lu, Baolu wrote:
>Hi Dave,
>
>Which device are you testing with? This implementation was developed
>and tested on Intel Skylake devices.
>
>It doesn't surprise me if it doesn't work with other silicons. But it
On 11/13/15 at 10:04am, Lu, Baolu wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On 11/12/2015 02:01 PM, Dave Young wrote:
> >Hi, Baolu
> >
> >On 11/12/15 at 10:45am, Lu, Baolu wrote:
> >>>Hi Dave,
> >>>
> >>>Which device are you testing with? This implementation was developed
> >>>and tested on Intel Skylake devices.
> >
On 11/13/2015 10:26 AM, Dave Young wrote:
On 11/13/15 at 10:04am, Lu, Baolu wrote:
Hi Dave,
On 11/12/2015 02:01 PM, Dave Young wrote:
Hi, Baolu
On 11/12/15 at 10:45am, Lu, Baolu wrote:
Hi Dave,
Which device are you testing with? This implementation was developed
and tested on Intel Skylak
11 matches
Mail list logo
