Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] ARM: at91/dt: update udc compatible strings

2015-01-12 Thread Boris Brezillon
On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:31:26 -0600 Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 08:18:16PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > Hi Felipe, > > > > On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:23:49 -0600 > > Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:57:56AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > > at91sam

Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] ARM: at91/dt: update udc compatible strings

2015-01-12 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 08:18:16PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Hi Felipe, > > On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:23:49 -0600 > Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:57:56AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > at91sam9g45, at91sam9x5 and sama5 SoCs should not use > > > "atmel,at91sam9rl-ud

Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] ARM: at91/dt: update udc compatible strings

2015-01-12 Thread Boris Brezillon
Hi Felipe, On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:23:49 -0600 Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:57:56AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > at91sam9g45, at91sam9x5 and sama5 SoCs should not use > > "atmel,at91sam9rl-udc" for their USB device compatible property since > > this compatible is attached

Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] ARM: at91/dt: update udc compatible strings

2015-01-12 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:57:56AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote: > at91sam9g45, at91sam9x5 and sama5 SoCs should not use > "atmel,at91sam9rl-udc" for their USB device compatible property since > this compatible is attached to a specific hardware bug fix. > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon > Acked

[PATCH v3 3/5] ARM: at91/dt: update udc compatible strings

2015-01-12 Thread Boris Brezillon
at91sam9g45, at91sam9x5 and sama5 SoCs should not use "atmel,at91sam9rl-udc" for their USB device compatible property since this compatible is attached to a specific hardware bug fix. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni --- arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g45.dtsi | 2 +- arch/