On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 04:42:32PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 28-02-18 16:15, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 04:07:45PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
> > > index 96099a245c69..5917e3095e2a 100644
Hi,
On 28-02-18 16:15, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 04:07:45PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
index 96099a245c69..5917e3095e2a 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
@@ -1825,6 +1825,7 @@
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 04:07:45PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
> index 96099a245c69..5917e3095e2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
> @@ -1825,6 +1825,7 @@ struct xhci_hcd {
> /* Reserved. It was
The xHCI controller on various Intel SoCs has an extended cap mmio-range
which contains registers to control the muxing to the xHCI (host mode)
or the dwc3 (device mode) and vbus-detection for the otg usb-phy.
Having a role-sw driver included in the xHCI code (under drivers/usb/host)
is not
