On Wednesday 19 August 2015 14:28:33 Duc Dang wrote:
>
> Hi Arnd,
>
> So the check will look like this, please let me know what do you think:
> if (!pdev->dev.dma_mask) {
> WARN_ON(1);
> /* Initialize dma_mask if the broken platform code has
> not done so *
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> On Saturday 08 August 2015 13:31:02 Duc Dang wrote:
> > >
> > > If we know that pdev->dev.dma_mask will always be initialised at this
> > > point, then the above change is fine. If not, it's introducing a
> > > regression - dma_set_mask_an
On Saturday 08 August 2015 13:31:02 Duc Dang wrote:
> >
> > If we know that pdev->dev.dma_mask will always be initialised at this
> > point, then the above change is fine. If not, it's introducing a
> > regression - dma_set_mask_and_coherent() will fail if pdev->dev.dma_mask
> > is NULL (depending
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 08:18:48PM -0700, Duc Dang wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c
>> index 890ad9d..5d03f8b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/x
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 08:18:48PM -0700, Duc Dang wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c
> index 890ad9d..5d03f8b 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c
> @@ -93,14 +93,14 @@ static int xhci_plat_probe(struct plat
The xhci platform driver needs to work on systems that
either only support 64-bit DMA or only support 32-bit DMA.
Attempt to set a coherent dma mask for 64-bit DMA, and
attempt again with 32-bit DMA if that fails.
[dhdang: Regenerate the patch over 4.2-rc5]
Signed-off-by: Mark Langsdorf
Tested-by
