hi,
On Mon, 2015-10-19 at 14:25 +0300, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> >>
> >> So basically we are trying to use as many microframes as possible with as
> >> few packets
> >> per microframe as possible.
> >>
> >> Did I understand this correctly?
> > Yes, you are right.
> >
> >> How will devices react if
On 20.10.2015 09:29, chunfeng yun wrote:
hi,
On Mon, 2015-10-19 at 14:25 +0300, Mathias Nyman wrote:
So basically we are trying to use as many microframes as possible with as few
packets
per microframe as possible.
Did I understand this correctly?
Yes, you are right.
How will devices
So basically we are trying to use as many microframes as possible with as few
packets
per microframe as possible.
Did I understand this correctly?
Yes, you are right.
How will devices react if they expect to get 16 packets every 16th microframe,
but they get one packet every microframe
Hi,
On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 17:46 +0300, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> On 29.09.2015 06:01, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> > There some vendor quirks for MTK xhci host controller:
> > 1. It defines some extra SW scheduling parameters for HW
> >to minimize the scheduling effort for synchronous and
> >
On 29.09.2015 06:01, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
There some vendor quirks for MTK xhci host controller:
1. It defines some extra SW scheduling parameters for HW
to minimize the scheduling effort for synchronous and
interrupt endpoints. The parameters are put into reseved
DWs of slot context and
On 08/10/15 13:05, chunfeng yun wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 12:44 +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
On 29/09/15 04:01, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
There some vendor quirks for MTK xhci host controller:
1. It defines some extra SW scheduling parameters for HW
to minimize the scheduling effort for
Hi,
On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 12:44 +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On 29/09/15 04:01, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> > There some vendor quirks for MTK xhci host controller:
> > 1. It defines some extra SW scheduling parameters for HW
> >to minimize the scheduling effort for synchronous and
> >
On 08.10.2015 15:28, Daniel Thompson wrote:
On 08/10/15 13:05, chunfeng yun wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 12:44 +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
On 29/09/15 04:01, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
There some vendor quirks for MTK xhci host controller:
1. It defines some extra SW scheduling parameters for
On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 13:28 +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On 08/10/15 13:05, chunfeng yun wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 12:44 +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> >> On 29/09/15 04:01, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> >>> There some vendor quirks for MTK xhci host controller:
> >>> 1. It defines some
Hi,
On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 16:05 +0300, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> On 08.10.2015 15:28, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > On 08/10/15 13:05, chunfeng yun wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 12:44 +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> >>> On 29/09/15 04:01, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> There some vendor quirks
On 29/09/15 04:01, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
There some vendor quirks for MTK xhci host controller:
1. It defines some extra SW scheduling parameters for HW
to minimize the scheduling effort for synchronous and
interrupt endpoints. The parameters are put into reseved
DWs of slot context and
There some vendor quirks for MTK xhci host controller:
1. It defines some extra SW scheduling parameters for HW
to minimize the scheduling effort for synchronous and
interrupt endpoints. The parameters are put into reseved
DWs of slot context and endpoint context.
2. Its IMODI unit for
12 matches
Mail list logo
