On 06/17/2013 08:25 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jun 2013, Sarah Sharp wrote:
The older patchset did have some useful improvements, aside from the
misguided patch to make the USB core be more robust about handling NULL
pointers from usb_hub_to_struct_hub(). As discussed, that could only
ha
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:40:24AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 09:55:17AM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> > This is a revised version of the patchset that was originally sent to
> > fix "security issues" identified by the Klockwork static analysis tool.
> > As discussed,
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 09:55:17AM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> This is a revised version of the patchset that was originally sent to
> fix "security issues" identified by the Klockwork static analysis tool.
> As discussed, these weren't real security issues, mostly just Klockwork
> not understandin
On Mon, 17 Jun 2013, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> The older patchset did have some useful improvements, aside from the
> misguided patch to make the USB core be more robust about handling NULL
> pointers from usb_hub_to_struct_hub(). As discussed, that could only
> happen if khubd binds to a hub with no
This is a revised version of the patchset that was originally sent to
fix "security issues" identified by the Klockwork static analysis tool.
As discussed, these weren't real security issues, mostly just Klockwork
not understanding that BUG() would stop code execution.
The older patchset did have
