Hi,
On 29 March 2017 at 07:04, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07 2017, Baolin Wang wrote:
>
>> On 3 March 2017 at 10:23, NeilBrown wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I understand your reluctance to change drivers that you cannot test.
>>> An alternative it do change all the
>>> atomic_notifier_call_chain(.*not
On Tue, Mar 07 2017, Baolin Wang wrote:
> On 3 March 2017 at 10:23, NeilBrown wrote:
>
>>
>> I understand your reluctance to change drivers that you cannot test.
>> An alternative it do change all the
>> atomic_notifier_call_chain(.*notifier,
>> calls that don't pass a pointer to vbus_draw to p
On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 14 March 2017 at 17:57, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, Baolin Wang wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> drivers/power/supply/wm831x_power.c | 63 +++
> >> drivers/usb/gadget/Kconfig |8 +
> >> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Makefil
Hi,
On 14 March 2017 at 17:57, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, Baolin Wang wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> drivers/power/supply/wm831x_power.c | 63 +++
>> drivers/usb/gadget/Kconfig |8 +
>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Makefile |1 +
>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/charger.c| 865
On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, Baolin Wang wrote:
[...]
> drivers/power/supply/wm831x_power.c | 63 +++
> drivers/usb/gadget/Kconfig |8 +
> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Makefile |1 +
> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/charger.c| 865
> +++
> drivers/usb/gadge
gt;> patc...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com; Linux PM list > p...@vger.kernel.org>; USB ; device-
>> mainlin...@lists.linuxfoundation.org; LKML
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with
>> the usb gadget power negotation
>>
> ... ..
n...@lists.linuxfoundation.org; LKML
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with
> the usb gadget power negotation
>
... ...
> >> That is same what USB charger did, from this point, we need USB
> >> charger to send out vbus draw inform
gt;> patc...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com; Linux PM list > p...@vger.kernel.org>; USB ; device-
>> mainlin...@lists.linuxfoundation.org; LKML
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with
>> the usb gadget power negotation
>>
>&
n...@lists.linuxfoundation.org; LKML
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with
> the usb gadget power negotation
>
> On 10 March 2017 at 16:27, Jun Li wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Baolin W
gt;> patc...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com; Linux PM list > p...@vger.kernel.org>; USB ; device-
>> mainlin...@lists.linuxfoundation.org; LKML
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with
>> the usb gadget power negotation
>>
>> On 10
n...@lists.linuxfoundation.org; LKML
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with
> the usb gadget power negotation
>
> On 10 March 2017 at 14:30, Jun Li wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Will generic phy need add extcon as we
On 10 March 2017 at 14:30, Jun Li wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Will generic phy need add extcon as well?
>> >>
>> >> Yes, will add a 'struct extcon_dev*' in 'struct usb_phy', which will
>> >> be common code.
>> >>
>> >
>> > I mean the common code need add 'struct extcon_dev' into both 'struct
>> > phy'
n...@lists.linuxfoundation.org; LKML
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with
> the usb gadget power negotation
>
> On 9 March 2017 at 18:34, Jun Li wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Baolin Wan
gt;> patc...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com; Linux PM list > p...@vger.kernel.org>; USB ; device-
>> mainlin...@lists.linuxfoundation.org; LKML
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with
>> the usb gadget power negotation
>>
>> Hi,
&g
n...@lists.linuxfoundation.org; LKML
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with
> the usb gadget power negotation
>
> Hi,
>
> On 9 March 2017 at 09:50, Jun Li wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> F
eepax ;
>> patc...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com; Linux PM list > p...@vger.kernel.org>; USB ; device-
>> mainlin...@lists.linuxfoundation.org; LKML
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with
>> the usb gadget power negotation
>>
>>
n...@lists.linuxfoundation.org; LKML
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with
> the usb gadget power negotation
>
> On 3 March 2017 at 10:23, NeilBrown wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 20 2017, Baolin Wang wrote:
> >
> >> Currently
On 3 March 2017 at 10:23, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20 2017, Baolin Wang wrote:
>
>> Currently the Linux kernel does not provide any standard integration of this
>> feature that integrates the USB subsystem with the system power regulation
>> provided by PMICs meaning that either vendors must
On Mon, Feb 20 2017, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Currently the Linux kernel does not provide any standard integration of this
> feature that integrates the USB subsystem with the system power regulation
> provided by PMICs meaning that either vendors must add this in their kernels
> or USB gadget devices
19 matches
Mail list logo
