Re: [PATCH] net: sk == 0xffffffff fix - not for commit

2014-01-24 Thread Andrew Ruder
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 07:38:31AM -0600, Andrew Ruder wrote: > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg574770.html > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58854 Just a little further confirmation. This appears in __inet_lookup_established as the last four instructions b

Re: [PATCH] net: sk == 0xffffffff fix - not for commit

2014-01-24 Thread Andrew Ruder
Actually found what looks to be a fix for this in another thread. http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg574770.html http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58854 Cheers, Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message

Re: [PATCH] net: sk == 0xffffffff fix - not for commit

2014-01-17 Thread Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
W dniu 17.01.2014 13:18, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz pisze: W dniu 16.01.2014 17:29, Eric Dumazet pisze: On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 16:21 +0100, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: W dniu 10.12.2013 15:25, Eric Dumazet pisze: On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 07:55 +0100, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: W dniu 09.12.2013 16:

Re: [PATCH] net: sk == 0xffffffff fix - not for commit

2014-01-17 Thread Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
W dniu 16.01.2014 17:29, Eric Dumazet pisze: On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 16:21 +0100, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: W dniu 10.12.2013 15:25, Eric Dumazet pisze: On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 07:55 +0100, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: W dniu 09.12.2013 16:31, Eric Dumazet pisze: On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 12:47 +0

Re: [PATCH] net: sk == 0xffffffff fix - not for commit

2014-01-16 Thread Andrew Ruder
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 12:47:52PM +0100, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: > With g_ether loaded the sk occasionally becomes 0x. > It happens usually after transferring few hundreds of kilobytes to few > tens of megabytes. If sk is 0x then dereferencing it causes > kernel panic. Don't

Re: [PATCH] net: sk == 0xffffffff fix - not for commit

2014-01-16 Thread Eric Dumazet
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 16:21 +0100, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: > W dniu 10.12.2013 15:25, Eric Dumazet pisze: > > On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 07:55 +0100, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: > >> W dniu 09.12.2013 16:31, Eric Dumazet pisze: > >>> On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 12:47 +0100, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote:

Re: [PATCH] net: sk == 0xffffffff fix - not for commit

2013-12-10 Thread Eric Dumazet
On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 07:55 +0100, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: > W dniu 09.12.2013 16:31, Eric Dumazet pisze: > > On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 12:47 +0100, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: > >> NOT FOR COMMITTING TO MAINLINE. > >> > >> With g_ether loaded the sk occasionally becomes 0x. > >> It happe

Re: [PATCH] net: sk == 0xffffffff fix - not for commit

2013-12-09 Thread Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
W dniu 09.12.2013 16:31, Eric Dumazet pisze: On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 12:47 +0100, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: NOT FOR COMMITTING TO MAINLINE. With g_ether loaded the sk occasionally becomes 0x. It happens usually after transferring few hundreds of kilobytes to few tens of megabytes. If s

Re: [PATCH] net: sk == 0xffffffff fix - not for commit

2013-12-09 Thread Eric Dumazet
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 12:47 +0100, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: > NOT FOR COMMITTING TO MAINLINE. > > With g_ether loaded the sk occasionally becomes 0x. > It happens usually after transferring few hundreds of kilobytes to few > tens of megabytes. If sk is 0x then dereferencing it