W dniu 17.02.2015 o 22:02, Ruslan Bilovol pisze:
Hi Andrzej,
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
wrote:
W dniu 15.02.2015 o 23:43, Ruslan Bilovol pisze:
In my opinion all things which you have described are working out-of-box
when you use configfs interface. It's mostl
Hi Andrzej,
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
wrote:
> W dniu 15.02.2015 o 23:43, Ruslan Bilovol pisze:
>
>
>
>>>
>>> In my opinion all things which you have described are working out-of-box
>>> when you use configfs interface. It's mostly ready so you may create
>>> equiva
W dniu 15.02.2015 o 23:43, Ruslan Bilovol pisze:
In my opinion all things which you have described are working out-of-box
when you use configfs interface. It's mostly ready so you may create
equivalent of most legacy gadgets (apart from printer and tcm) and
just bind from one udc to another w
eter Chen; linux-usb@vger.kernel.org;
>> linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Balbi, Felipe;
>> gre...@linuxfoundation.org; Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: gadget: udc-core: independent
>> registration of gadgets and gadget drivers
>>
>> Hi guys,
>
Hi Alan,
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 10:00 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Feb 2015, Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
>
>> > Why bother matching by name? Why not simply take the first
>> > available
>> > UDC?
>>
>> Because you may have more than one udc. This would allow to pick one by
>> name just like us
undation.org; Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: gadget: udc-core: independent
> registration of gadgets and gadget drivers
>
> Hi guys,
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 10:00 PM, Alan Stern
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 9 Feb 2015, Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
> &g
Hi guys,
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 10:00 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Feb 2015, Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
>
>> > Why bother matching by name? Why not simply take the first
>> > available
>> > UDC?
>>
>> Because you may have more than one udc. This would allow to pick one by
>> name just like us
On Mon, 9 Feb 2015, Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
> > Why bother matching by name? Why not simply take the first
> > available
> > UDC?
>
> Because you may have more than one udc. This would allow to pick one by
> name just like using configfs interface.
Clearly it would be more flexible to allow th
7;
> Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
> 'Balbi, Felipe'; gre...@linuxfoundation.org; Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] usb: gadget: udc-core: independent
> registration of gadgets and gadget drivers
>
> Hi,
>
> (... snip ...)
>
&g
Hi,
(... snip ...)
>
> > > You don't need all this stuff. What's the point of keeping
> track of
> > > names? If there are any unbound gadget drivers pending, a
> newly
> > > registered UDC should bind to the first one available.
> >
> > It's because gadget driver may be bound to usb_gadget in
On Sun, 8 Feb 2015, Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Jan 2015, Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
> >
> >> Change behavior during registration of gadgets and
> >> gadget drivers in udc-core. Instead of previous
> >> approach when for succe
On Sun, Feb 08, 2015 at 09:04:32PM +0200, Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Jan 2015, Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
> >
> >> Change behavior during registration of gadgets and
> >> gadget drivers in udc-core. Instead of previous
> >> ap
Hi Alan,
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2015, Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
>
>> Change behavior during registration of gadgets and
>> gadget drivers in udc-core. Instead of previous
>> approach when for successful probe of usb gadget driver
>> at least one usb gadget
On Thu, 29 Jan 2015, Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
> Change behavior during registration of gadgets and
> gadget drivers in udc-core. Instead of previous
> approach when for successful probe of usb gadget driver
> at least one usb gadget should be already registered
> use another one where gadget drivers
14 matches
Mail list logo
