On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 07:47:11PM +0100, Giuseppe Lippolis wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> > If possible you want to tell the option driver which interfaces to
> > bind to (white-listing) rather than specifying which not to bind to
> > (black-listing). The latter typically means probing all interfaces,
Dear All,
> If possible you want to tell the option driver which interfaces to
> bind to (white-listing) rather than specifying which not to bind to
> (black-listing). The latter typically means probing all interfaces,
> checking the black list, and then bailing out for unsupported
>
57
> > An: Dan Williams <d...@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Giuseppe Lippolis <giu.lippo...@gmail.com>; linux-...@vger.kern
> > el.org
> > Betreff: Re: add usb option device
> >
> > On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 11:49 -0600, Dan Williams wrote:
> > &g
On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 11:15 +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:03:52PM +0100, Giuseppe Lippolis wrote:
> >
> > Dear All,
> > thanks for the very interesting discussion.
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > This will make option grab all the ports, as shown by your
> > > > dmesg
> > >
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:03:52PM +0100, Giuseppe Lippolis wrote:
> Dear All,
> thanks for the very interesting discussion.
>
> > > This will make option grab all the ports, as shown by your dmesg
> > > output. But USB interfaces 0 and 1 are actually cdc-ether and should
> > > *not* be grabbed
On 2016-11-17 03:57, Oliver Neukum wrote:
On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 11:49 -0600, Dan Williams wrote:
This will make option grab all the ports, as shown by your dmesg
output. But USB interfaces 0 and 1 are actually cdc-ether and should
*not* be grabbed by option.
You want to limit option to
On 2016-11-17 01:35, Dan Williams wrote:
Also, is it really a D-Link DWM-158? That appears to be a USB dongle-
type device, while what's in the DWR-512 is a PCI-E minicard that looks
like a ZTE MF210, from the FCC pictures.
DWR-512A1 uses the ZTE MF210 module while DWR-512B1 uses the D-Link
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
> Betreff: Re: add usb option device
>
> On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 11:49 -0600, Dan Williams wrote:
> > This will make option grab all the ports, as shown by your dmesg
> > output. But USB interfaces 0 and 1 are actually cdc-ether and should
> >
On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 11:49 -0600, Dan Williams wrote:
> This will make option grab all the ports, as shown by your dmesg
> output. But USB interfaces 0 and 1 are actually cdc-ether and should
> *not* be grabbed by option.
>
> You want to limit option to grabbing bInterfaceClass=255 to make sure
Dear All,
thanks for the very interesting discussion.
> > This will make option grab all the ports, as shown by your dmesg
> > output. But USB interfaces 0 and 1 are actually cdc-ether and should
> > *not* be grabbed by option.
> >
> > You want to limit option to grabbing bInterfaceClass=255 to
On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 11:49 -0600, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 20:13 +0100, Giuseppe Lippolis wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> > I'm porting the Dlink DWR-512 device to LEDE (embedded linux).
> > This device embed a 3G modem connected through the usb bus .
> > The modem work properly
On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 20:13 +0100, Giuseppe Lippolis wrote:
> Dear all,
> I'm porting the Dlink DWR-512 device to LEDE (embedded linux).
> This device embed a 3G modem connected through the usb bus .
> The modem work properly with the option kernel module.
>
> I added these line in the
>
>
On 2016-11-16 02:13, Giuseppe Lippolis wrote:
Dear all,
I'm porting the Dlink DWR-512 device to LEDE (embedded linux).
This device embed a 3G modem connected through the usb bus .
The modem work properly with the option kernel module.
I added these line in the
#define
> Your email client ate the tabs and spit out spaces and line-wrapped the
> patch, making it impossible to apply.
>
> Also, you need to make it against the latest kernel tree, 4.4 is really
old.
>
> And finally, there is no good subject: line, or description of the patch,
or a
> signed-off-by:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 08:46:31PM +0100, Giuseppe Lippolis wrote:
> Here it is:
>
> --- a/linux-4.4.23/drivers/usb/serial/option.c2016-09-30
> 10:20:43.0 +0200
> +++ b/linux-4.4.30/drivers/usb/serial/option.c 2016-11-14
> 21:01:15.738450136 +0100
> @@ -306,6 +306,9 @@
) },
bye
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. November 2016 20:19
> An: Giuseppe Lippolis <giu.lippo...@gmail.com>
> Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
> Betreff: Re: add usb option device
>
>
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 08:13:56PM +0100, Giuseppe Lippolis wrote:
> Dear all,
> I'm porting the Dlink DWR-512 device to LEDE (embedded linux).
> This device embed a 3G modem connected through the usb bus .
> The modem work properly with the option kernel module.
>
> I added these line in the
>
Dear all,
I'm porting the Dlink DWR-512 device to LEDE (embedded linux).
This device embed a 3G modem connected through the usb bus .
The modem work properly with the option kernel module.
I added these line in the
#define DLINK_PRODUCT_DWM_652 0x3e04
#define
18 matches
Mail list logo
