Re: fsl_udc_core: set address request aren't handled like expected. usb30cv test suite fails.

2013-03-11 Thread Peter Chen
> > Hi, > > I tested your patch, Peter and it works fine. All tests of the usbcv30 > are passing with my setup. Thank you so far. > > So you get a tested-by: peter.best...@omicron.at > > In my opinion we do it in the wrong order; we set the address before the > status stage > completes. But i

RE: fsl_udc_core: set address request aren't handled like expected. usb30cv test suite fails.

2013-03-11 Thread Peter Bestler
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 11:54:41AM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 05:38:53PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:58:52AM +0100, Peter Bestler wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > We try to get our device (based on p2020rdb) usb 2.0 compliant. We ran > > > the usb

Re: fsl_udc_core: set address request aren't handled like expected. usb30cv test suite fails.

2013-03-08 Thread Alexander Shishkin
Peter Chen writes: > On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:58:52AM +0100, Peter Bestler wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We try to get our device (based on p2020rdb) usb 2.0 compliant. We ran the >> usb30cv test suite (version 1.0.1.2, chapter 9 tests for usb 2.0 devices) on >> win7 with g_zero and g_serial. We acces

Re: fsl_udc_core: set address request aren't handled like expected. usb30cv test suite fails.

2013-03-08 Thread Peter Chen
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 11:54:41AM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 05:38:53PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:58:52AM +0100, Peter Bestler wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > We try to get our device (based on p2020rdb) usb 2.0 compliant. We ran > > > the usb

Re: fsl_udc_core: set address request aren't handled like expected. usb30cv test suite fails.

2013-03-08 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 05:38:53PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote: > On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:58:52AM +0100, Peter Bestler wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We try to get our device (based on p2020rdb) usb 2.0 compliant. We ran the > > usb30cv test suite (version 1.0.1.2, chapter 9 tests for usb 2.0 devices) >

Re: fsl_udc_core: set address request aren't handled like expected. usb30cv test suite fails.

2013-03-08 Thread Peter Chen
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:58:52AM +0100, Peter Bestler wrote: > Hi, > > We try to get our device (based on p2020rdb) usb 2.0 compliant. We ran the > usb30cv test suite (version 1.0.1.2, chapter 9 tests for usb 2.0 devices) on > win7 with g_zero and g_serial. We access the device via an usb 3.0

Re: fsl_udc_core: set address request aren't handled like expected. usb30cv test suite fails.

2013-03-07 Thread Peter Chen
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:58:52AM +0100, Peter Bestler wrote: > Hi, > > We try to get our device (based on p2020rdb) usb 2.0 compliant. We ran the > usb30cv test suite (version 1.0.1.2, chapter 9 tests for usb 2.0 devices) on > win7 with g_zero and g_serial. We access the device via an usb 3.0

fsl_udc_core: set address request aren't handled like expected. usb30cv test suite fails.

2013-03-07 Thread Peter Bestler
Hi, We try to get our device (based on p2020rdb) usb 2.0 compliant. We ran the usb30cv test suite (version 1.0.1.2, chapter 9 tests for usb 2.0 devices) on win7 with g_zero and g_serial. We access the device via an usb 3.0 hcd from intel. Our device runs the 3.2.35-rt52 kernel. I spotted the fo