On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 07:39:08PM -0500, David Nelson wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Attached are patches for both the Linus and Alan trees. This should
> bring both trees into sync with my version.
The patches are the same, but for the -ac tree, you forgot the
scanner.txt update.
You also backed ou
Braddock Gaskill wrote:
>Hi guys,
>I finaly got a break from work to play with the compression a little.
>
>Jorg, is the grey1 uncompressed image actually an example of the image
>once passed through the NT1003/4, with typical noise? Or is it an
>original without any noise?
>
>If it's an exampl
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 10:50:09AM +0530, invictus rm wrote:
> Athought the bulk read is posted to the device from my bluetooth stack
> through the USBbluetooth driver , it never shows up to have reached to the
> bluetooth module ( CSR hardware ).
But you see it on the wire (through the CATC US
Athought the bulk read is posted to the device from my bluetooth stack
through the USBbluetooth driver , it never shows up to have reached to the
bluetooth module ( CSR hardware ).
Can I replace FILL_BULK_URB with FILL_BULK_URB_TO
What difference will it make
How can i decrease the nu
I've not seen any for sale, but someone did send me one.
It's been a help getting the interrupt transfers to behave;
they're almost working, which means highspeed hub
support isn't too far away. (I've been really short on
USB hacking time until recently.)
FYI as soon as I get the interrupt trans
Hi All,
Attached are patches for both the Linus and Alan trees. This should
bring both trees into sync with my version.
Please see scanner.c's Changelog for version 0.4.6 for updates/changes.
Hopefully the SMP stuff is taken care of.
Let me know if you have any questions/comments.
Regards,
On Tue, 2001-10-16 at 23:55, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 07:58:40PM +0800, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > Haven't had time to look at it for a couple of days but as far as I can
> > see usb is mainly merged in 2.4.13pre2 andd has another usb-uhci bug
> > fixed but no luck
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001, Brad Hards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthew Dharm wrote:
> >
> > I've heard that 2.0 hubs are available on the store shelves in Australia,
> > but that's about all I've heard.
> That would have been my advice :)
>
> I have two on my lab desk. They are based on the NEC c
Matthew Dharm wrote:
>
> I've heard that 2.0 hubs are available on the store shelves in Australia,
> but that's about all I've heard.
That would have been my advice :)
I have two on my lab desk. They are based on the NEC chipset that have
apparently been recalled. I don't know what the failure m
I've heard that 2.0 hubs are available on the store shelves in Australia,
but that's about all I've heard.
Matt
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 03:18:27PM -0400, Matt Kaufman wrote:
> Apologies for the somewhat off-topic post.
> Anyone on this list know of a vendor
> with USB 2.0 compliant hubs availabl
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001, Matt Kaufman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apologies for the somewhat off-topic post.
> Anyone on this list know of a vendor
> with USB 2.0 compliant hubs available? The links on the USB.org pages lead
> you to vendors who claim their hub chips have all been recalled and no hu
Apologies for the somewhat off-topic post.
Anyone on this list know of a vendor
with USB 2.0 compliant hubs available? The links on the USB.org pages lead
you to vendors who claim their hub chips have all been recalled and no hubs
till November.
--
Matt Kaufman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 10:08:51PM +0530, invictus rm wrote:
> What it(CATC) showed was innumerable number of IN packets suggesting polling
> on the bluetooth hardware .
A bulk read is posted to the device. If the device does not have any
data to send, it responds with a NAK. No real bandwidth
hi ,
I am trying to make my bluetooth stack work with the usb-uhci.c on strong
arm 1110.
everything goes fine upto the point when i am sending the command packets
from the bluetooth stack which converts to the usb control packets .
But when i send the first acl packet from the stack , the corr
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 07:58:40PM +0800, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Haven't had time to look at it for a couple of days but as far as I can
> see usb is mainly merged in 2.4.13pre2 andd has another usb-uhci bug
> fixed but no luck. included is the processed oops and some info from
> dm
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 09:19:00PM +, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > They could have a DC-DC converter built in to bump up the output
> > voltage. They usually just have thicker (more copper, less voltage drop)
> > power lines in the cable, though.
>
> Read usb spec. They say that length *is* probl
Hi Guys,
Haven't had time to look at it for a couple of days but as far as I can
see usb is mainly merged in 2.4.13pre2 andd has another usb-uhci bug
fixed but no luck. included is the processed oops and some info from
dmesg up to the unprocessed oops - i found the unable to handle kernel
paging
"O. Beaudoux" wrote:
> I want to build an application that can use multiple input devices at the
> same time (typically two HIDs) for special kind of interaction (research
> perspective), with the ability to detect new incoming devices.
>
> All is ok to check for the last point (hot'plug) but I d
18 matches
Mail list logo
