Re: [linux-usb-devel] lsusb doesn't give me HID report descriptors

2001-10-21 Thread Philipp Matthias Hahn
On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, O. Beaudoux wrote: > I try to get a HID report descriptor using lsusb from usbutils-0.8 package > for 3 devices: ... > and all is ok except on the HID report descriptor. ... > cannot get report descriptor ... > So what's going wrong ? Let me guess: You have "hid.o" or "moused

[linux-usb-devel] Belkin USB 10/100 Eth. Adapter or Compex Linkport/UE202A

2001-10-21 Thread Drew Maule
Does anyone know if there are any linux drivers for these two devices? How about hardware datasheets? If not, what is the best way to convince companies to give me this information? My initial intentions are not to develop Linux device drivers for these, but to use these in a Senior design proj

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] first attempt at LEGO USB Tower kernel driver

2001-10-21 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 09:38:05PM +0200, Juergen Stuber wrote: > > I looked at that as the first option, but that would need a > modification of the serial driver framework to be able to use > interrupt endpoints instead of bulk endpoints, or am I missing > something? Would you do that modifica

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb-storage:probe()vs.usbdevfs:claim_interface() race?

2001-10-21 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Sonntag, 21. Oktober 2001 23:45 schrieb David Brownell: > > > > > (b) usb_find_interface_driver() uses the dev->serialize semaphore > > > > > for exclusion, but usbdevfs uses the BKL instead. > > > > > > > > This is not all, it uses driver->serialize() as well. > > > > > > Ah so it does.

Re: [linux-usb-devel] About Keyboard driver

2001-10-21 Thread Johannes Erdfelt
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001, ysun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are two keyboard drivers under USB tree. One is HID driver which > includes keyboard support. Another one is usb_kbd.c.Can anyone kindly tell > me which one should be used by user. Are there any major different between > these two drive

[linux-usb-devel] About Keyboard driver

2001-10-21 Thread ysun
There are two keyboard drivers under USB tree. One is HID driver which includes keyboard support. Another one is usb_kbd.c.Can anyone kindly tell me which one should be used by user. Are there any major different between these two drivers? Thanks Sun _

[linux-usb-devel] Re: real support for an Aiptek 8000USB

2001-10-21 Thread Chris Atenasio
Well, it's done for now. Thanks to help from Oliver Kuechemann, I've written a basic Linux driver for the Aiptek 8000U USB tablet. It reports events through the input core, and as such works with the Wacom USB X driver. Please note however that while the driver does work, it is _very_ alpha an

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb-storage:probe()vs.usbdevfs:claim_interface() race?

2001-10-21 Thread David Brownell
> > > > (b) usb_find_interface_driver() uses the dev->serialize semaphore > > > > for exclusion, but usbdevfs uses the BKL instead. > > > > > > This is not all, it uses driver->serialize() as well. > > > > Ah so it does. But still, usbdevfs uses neither, > > and that's clearly wrong: three

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb-storage:probe() vs.usbdevfs:claim_interface() race?

2001-10-21 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Sonntag, 21. Oktober 2001 19:46 schrieben Sie: > > > The simplest answer is (b): > > > > > > (b) usb_find_interface_driver() uses the dev->serialize semaphore > > > for exclusion, but usbdevfs uses the BKL instead. > > > > This is not all, it uses driver->serialize() as well. > > Ah so it

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] first attempt at LEGO USB Tower kernel driver

2001-10-21 Thread Juergen Stuber
Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 08:48:58AM +0200, Juergen Stuber wrote: > > No, but from a captured log under W98 I figured that it basically > > sends/receives the data as is on the IR Port, but only once. > > I see urbs with exactly the data that should be sent/received according > > to

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb-storage:probe() vs.usbdevfs:claim_interface() race?

2001-10-21 Thread David Brownell
> > The simplest answer is (b): > > > > (b) usb_find_interface_driver() uses the dev->serialize semaphore > > for exclusion, but usbdevfs uses the BKL instead. > > This is not all, it uses driver->serialize() as well. Ah so it does. But still, usbdevfs uses neither, and that's clearly wr

Re: [linux-usb-devel] PIIX errata [ bandwidth reclamation ]

2001-10-21 Thread Johannes Erdfelt
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001, Georg Acher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 10:26:26PM +1000, Brad Hards wrote: > > I recently found a set of PIIX chipset errata - > > http://www2.lm-sensors.nu/~lm78/pdfs/PIIX4-addendum.pdf. I note the following > > USB related issues. > > > > 4. USB B

Re: [linux-usb-devel] PIIX errata [ bandwidth reclamation ]

2001-10-21 Thread Brad Hards
Georg Acher wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 10:26:26PM +1000, Brad Hards wrote: > > I recently found a set of PIIX chipset errata - > > http://www2.lm-sensors.nu/~lm78/pdfs/PIIX4-addendum.pdf. I note the following > > USB related issues. > > > > 4. USB Bandwidth Reclamation Errata > > > This

Re: [linux-usb-devel] PIIX errata [ bandwidth reclamation ]

2001-10-21 Thread Georg Acher
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 10:26:26PM +1000, Brad Hards wrote: > I recently found a set of PIIX chipset errata - > http://www2.lm-sensors.nu/~lm78/pdfs/PIIX4-addendum.pdf. I note the following > USB related issues. > > 4. USB Bandwidth Reclamation Errata > This seems to be required, but (AFAICT) is

[linux-usb-devel] PIIX errata [ bandwidth reclamation ]

2001-10-21 Thread Brad Hards
I recently found a set of PIIX chipset errata - http://www2.lm-sensors.nu/~lm78/pdfs/PIIX4-addendum.pdf. I note the following USB related issues. 4. USB Bandwidth Reclamation Errata This seems to be required, but (AFAICT) is not being applied in either driver. 7. USB Rise / Fall Time Matching No

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb-storage:probe() vs. usbdevfs:claim_interface() race?

2001-10-21 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Sonntag, 21. Oktober 2001 01:34 schrieben Sie: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2001, Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > f) no problem at all. this is as designed > > > > > > It's probably a design flaw. > > > > Maybe we should abandon the idea of using a filesystem for this and have > > a dri

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb-storage:probe() vs. usbdevfs:claim_interface() race?

2001-10-21 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Sonntag, 21. Oktober 2001 03:36 schrieb Matthew Dharm: > I don't think moving to a generic usb driver is going to help.. the problem > there is that userspace would need to change what that driver can accept > and then re-issue a probe, _without_ unloading and reloading the module. Only if you