Ah, I tried it with 2.5.6-pre2 and usb-uhci.. still got a panic, when I
tried to print to the printer (which is what I was doing before too)
Also, got these in my kernel log...
usb-uhci.c: ENXIO 8200, flags 0, urb c1523ac0, burb c1523a40
usb-uhci.c: ENXIO 8200, flags 0, urb d7983c40, bur
OK, after some compilation problems with 2.5.6-pre2 (ide-scsi wouldn't
compile, then OSS sound had an error too.. both not essential to me), I
got it up, and still got a panic. It's attached. Should I try the other
UHCI driver now?
On Mar 05, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 01:33:17PM -0
> If I take the default package size 20 value to send it to my bluethooth
> device through USB, it fails because the Linux
> driver doesn't properly terminate a USB OUT transfer with a zero length
> packet when the transfer size is an integer multiple of the packet size.
Are you using the USB_ZER
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 10:40:59AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > Ah, that's it. include/net/irda/irda-usb.h was missed in the big "no
> > more static urb allocations" fixup. Give me a few minutes to change
> > this.
>
> Jean, does the patch below fix your
Hi all gurus,
I notice "USB driver might not generate a zero length packet" when I am
using a bluetooth stack called Bluez 2.0 -pre6 with Transilica Bluetooth USB
modules on REdhat7.2 (kernel 2.4.17 and 2.4.9) to try the Bluez utility
l2ping.
If I take the default package size 20 value to send i
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:05:22AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> It's not that you get asked all of the questions, it's that you see:
Ok, in playing around with this I see what you are all talking about.
I've fixed this by moving the 'fi' to the second from last line in the
Config.in file in both my
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 01:33:17PM -0600, James Curbo wrote:
> On Mar 05, Greg KH wrote:
> > Can you reproduce these with the 2.4.6-pre2 kernel?
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> I presume you mean 2.5.6-pre2, as 2.4 is way past that.. I will try it
> tonight after I get in from work...
Yes
On Mar 05, Greg KH wrote:
> Can you reproduce these with the 2.4.6-pre2 kernel?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
I presume you mean 2.5.6-pre2, as 2.4 is way past that.. I will try it
tonight after I get in from work...
--
James Curbo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Undergraduate Computer Sci
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 12:46:04PM -0600, James Curbo wrote:
> [not subscribed to either list, cc: me please]
>
> I got these today while trying to print to my HP Deskjet 845c USB printer.
> I'm running 2.5.5-dj2.
Can you reproduce these with the 2.4.6-pre2 kernel?
thanks,
greg k-h
__
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 10:54:12AM -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 10:40:59AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 01:41:41PM -0500, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> > >
> > > Hmm, I wonder if there might have been a change in the PCI DMA, or
> > > perhaps the URB al
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 10:40:59AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
>
> Ah, that's it. include/net/irda/irda-usb.h was missed in the big "no
> more static urb allocations" fixup. Give me a few minutes to change
> this.
Jean, does the patch below fix your problem?
thanks,
greg k-h
diff -Nru a/drivers/
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 10:40:59AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 01:41:41PM -0500, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> >
> > Hmm, I wonder if there might have been a change in the PCI DMA, or
> > perhaps the URB allocation changes introduced a bug.
>
> Ah, that's it. include/net/irda/ir
[not subscribed to either list, cc: me please]
I got these today while trying to print to my HP Deskjet 845c USB printer.
I'm running 2.5.5-dj2. I think the first one came from when I booted,
and the second one came from when I unplugged the USB cable to my
printer and plugged it back in. My moth
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 10:38:53AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
>
> Not true. I changed it in 2.5.4-pre2 when I changed the way
> usb_submit_urb() was called. But those changes "shouldn't" have caused
> this :)
Cosmetic changes don't count as changes to me ;-) You also
changed the error codes
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 01:41:41PM -0500, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
>
> Hmm, I wonder if there might have been a change in the PCI DMA, or
> perhaps the URB allocation changes introduced a bug.
Ah, that's it. include/net/irda/irda-usb.h was missed in the big "no
more static urb allocations" fixup
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 10:35:26AM -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 01:30:38PM -0500, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> > Has the IrDA code changed much between 2.5.3 and 2.5.5?
>
> Not at all. That's what puzzle me.
Not true. I changed it in 2.5.4-pre2 when I changed the w
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002, Jean Tourrilhes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 01:30:38PM -0500, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> >
> > That usually indicates a bad pointer passed to the HCD from the
> > driver.
>
> Ok. Bad buffer or bad urb ? I guess bad buffer. I'll check
> that. In
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 01:30:38PM -0500, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
>
> That usually indicates a bad pointer passed to the HCD from the
> driver.
Ok. Bad buffer or bad urb ? I guess bad buffer. I'll check
that. In Rx or Tx ? Hard to tell...
> Has the IrDA code changed much between 2.5.3 a
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002, Jean Tourrilhes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since I upgraded to 2.5.5, I can't make my UHCI card
> work. Currently, I'm using 2.5.6-pre2, still no go. Before that, I was
> using 2.5.3 and it was working fine.
> The UHCI is a VIA card. I'm only having a IrDA dongl
Hi,
Since I upgraded to 2.5.5, I can't make my UHCI card
work. Currently, I'm using 2.5.6-pre2, still no go. Before that, I was
using 2.5.3 and it was working fine.
The UHCI is a VIA card. I'm only having a IrDA dongle on it
(using irda-usb). Box is SMP PPro 150MHz.
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 09:58:09AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 04:51:16AM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > I notice that when CONFIG_USB is off you still get a whole bunch
> > of comments printed from drivers/usb/Config.in when running
> > "make oldconfig"
> >
> > Two possibl
> Von: Wessler, Siegfried [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Von: Greg KH [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> > I'd recommend 2.4.17 at the least, with 2.4.18-rc2 the best
> > bet. Using
> > the 2.4.18-rc2-gregkh-1 patch I sent out would be even better :)
>
> Thank You. I'll give one of them a try.
J
22 matches
Mail list logo
