Hi!
I've merged a patch Paul Stewart sent me some time ago, which should make life
easier for the guys writing UPS daemons.
Vojtech
You can import this changeset into BK by piping this whole message to:
'| bk receive [path to repository]' or apply the patch as usual.
=
Hi!
One of my earlier patches backed out a change that fixed all
copy_to_user calls to properly return -EFAULT if needed. This puts the
change back in.
You can import this changeset into BK by piping this whole message to:
'| bk receive [path to repository]' or apply the patch as usual.
===
Hi...
i've written a driver for USB
modem.it uses bulk transfers.I am facing a problem when i stress
it with UHCI host controller.when i run multuiple
ftp sessions simultaneously(uploads and downloads),
after sometime data transfers stop and the modem
ceases to be operational.i dont face
You sholud probably try a more modern kernel, that one is a year and a
half old.
On Sat, 13 Jul 2002, Avinash natarajan wrote:
> Hi...
> i've written a driver for USB modem.it uses bulk transfers.I am facing a problem
>when i stress
> it with UHCI host controller.when i run multuiple ftp s
This is a patch against the 2.5 usb-storage tree. Greg, please apply.
The purpose of this patch is to trap all commands which have a bogus
request_bufflen. Much logic is devoted to calculating the proper length of
the transfer, but according to discussions I've had on linux-scsi, this is
really
On Sat, 13 Jul 2002 22:33, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've merged a patch Paul Stewart sent me some time ago, which should make
> life easier for the guys writing UPS daemons.
2.5 only? What about 2.4?
Brad
--
http://conf.linux.org.au. 22-25Jan2003. Perth, Australia. Birds in Black.