Hi.
does anyone know if this device (PDA) has / works with any of the linux
USB drivers?
It seems to have 3 endpoints (correct term? Im new to USB), and I
suspect uses them for a ppp link to a host machine.
if not, where should I start?
---
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 14:53:53 +
Ian Molton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if not, where should I start?
Im told I should post the details of /proc/bus/usb/* for it here, which
I will do as soon as I get the thing back (its been recalled due to a
PCB fault).
I've decided this probably a question better answered by the
community, so it's attached below.
The problem boils down to the fact that I can't use urb_list to keep a
list of urbs for later unlinking. I'm thinking the best solution is to
add a second list_head to struct urb.
..Stu
-
Am Montag, 18. November 2002 15:29 schrieb Rob Miller:
Hi,
erm, my driver seems to be escaping into the wild, probably time to check
in and get some things right before it gets too far... honest, I just put
it on my website without any effort at advertising for people to find on
their own,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 01:29, Rob Miller wrote:
snip
* see the driver: currently at http://www.janerob.com/rob/ts5100/cPad
Says:
modprobe cpad (you may need to rmmod hid and/or usbmouse)
Does it claim to be a HID device?
What does
Rob Miller wrote:
Hi,
* future: no new devices in 2.4, so far my driver just hangs out on the
Is this true? I had not heard of a device freeze in 2.4, and I was
under the impression that new drivers would be allowed in after
2.4.20-final comes out. This causes me some concern with regard
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 03:40:01PM -0800, Matthew Dharm wrote:
This patch changes freecom.c and isd200.c to use the new data-moving logic
instead of the old data-moving logic. This allows for code consolidation
and better error-handling.
Greg, please apply.
Applied, thanks.
greg k-h
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 03:38:46PM -0800, Matthew Dharm wrote:
This patch changes the data buffer type from char* to void*, and fixes some
problems with debug prints and comments.
Greg, please apply.
Applied, thanks.
greg k-h
---
This
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 05:19:27PM +1100, Brad Hards wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 12:22, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 04:07:50PM -0800, Matthew Dharm wrote:
It's a matter of avoiding typecasts everywhere. We get a void*, and
we send void* on to other places.
Yeah, looking at
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 03:41:28PM -0800, Matthew Dharm wrote:
This patch puts all the code to interpret the result code from an URB into
a single place, instead of copying it everywhere throughout transport.c
Greg, please apply.
Applied, thanks.
greg k-h
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 02:29:56PM +, Rob Miller wrote:
(1) I just 'grabbed' ioctls 'U' 0x71-0x79 (77-79 in the 0.3 ver at
home). I tried e-mailing the person in the kernel docs about ioctl
numbering and assignments, he replied that he's given up tracking them.
Why do you need ioctls
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 02:17:18PM -0500, Stuart MacDonald wrote:
I've decided this probably a question better answered by the
community, so it's attached below.
The problem boils down to the fact that I can't use urb_list to keep a
list of urbs for later unlinking. I'm thinking the best
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 07:48:32PM +0100, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
Hi,
here is a patch I found which support Sony DSC-U10.
I test it with 2.4.19.
I attached the patch, a dmesg log and a lsusb output.
Can you apply it, please ?
Please send this to the usb-storage author and maintainer.
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 01:59:00PM -0800, Superlucidity Support wrote:
Rob Miller wrote:
Hi,
* future: no new devices in 2.4, so far my driver just hangs out on the
Is this true? I had not heard of a device freeze in 2.4, and I was
under the impression that new drivers would be
On Friday 01 November 2002 08:52, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 08:59:44AM +0100, Duncan Sands wrote:
Doing /etc/init.d/hotplug restart gives the following oops.
This seems to be a variant of the 25.44 oops problems.
Yeah, the reference counting logic isn't cleaned up fully yet. I
Oliver Neukum wrote:
am I right in assuming that cutting out automatic resubmission means
that resubmitting an interrupt urb may now end in ENOMEM ?
Right. Previously resubmit errors could happen, but you'd have had
no way to know, since all resubmit errors were dropped on the floor.
ENOMEM
Stuart MacDonald wrote:
The problem boils down to the fact that I can't use urb_list to keep a
list of urbs for later unlinking. I'm thinking the best solution is to
add a second list_head to struct urb.
You've already got urb-context for per-request data. The data it points
to would seem to
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Oliver Neukum wrote:
OK, here we go.
case CPAD_CGID:
- Race condition. You must drop the lock only after the last put_user
fixed.
/* see if we are already in the middle of a write */
if (dev-write_urb-status == -EINPROGRESS) {
dbg (__FUNCTION__ -
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Brad Hards wrote:
* see the driver: currently at http://www.janerob.com/rob/ts5100/cPad
Says:
modprobe cpad (you may need to rmmod hid and/or usbmouse)
this comment was for folk who had followed my suggestions elsewhre on the
pages. I've re-written to be more accurate,
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Superlucidity Support wrote:
Rob Miller wrote:
Hi,
* future: no new devices in 2.4, so far my driver just hangs out on the
Is this true? I had not heard of a device freeze in 2.4, and I was
under the impression that new drivers would be allowed in after
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 09:44:32AM -0800, Joe Burks wrote:
This is the same patch as before, without the checks for CONFIG_PROC_FS.
Greg, please apply
Oops, sorry, I just realized that I had added this patch to my tree, but
not the one I sent to Linus, so it didn't end up in 2.5.48. Very
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 02:29:56PM +, Rob Miller wrote:
(1) I just 'grabbed' ioctls 'U' 0x71-0x79 (77-79 in the 0.3 ver at
home). I tried e-mailing the person in the kernel docs about ioctl
numbering and assignments, he replied that he's given up
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 01:13:36AM +, Rob Miller wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 02:29:56PM +, Rob Miller wrote:
(1) I just 'grabbed' ioctls 'U' 0x71-0x79 (77-79 in the 0.3 ver at
home). I tried e-mailing the person in the kernel docs about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 11:34, Rob Miller wrote:
snip
T: Bus=02 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=01 Cnt=01 Dev#= 3 Spd=12 MxCh= 0
D: Ver= 1.10 Cls=00(ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS= 8 #Cfgs= 1
P: Vendor=06cb ProdID=0003 Rev= 0.11
S: Manufacturer=Synaptics Inc.
24 matches
Mail list logo
