On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 21:30:29 -0800
Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > partly because of comments on this list about it being better than
> > just leaving users to do everything through file i/o :-)
>
> Hm, no, not a good idea :)
why do people hate IOCTLs ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 20:06, Ian Molton wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 21:30:29 -0800
>
> Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > partly because of comments on this list about it being better than
> > > just leaving users to do everything through file i/o
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Brad Hards wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 11:34, Rob Miller wrote:
> > S: Product=Synaptics cPad
> > C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=80 MxPwr=100mA
> > I: If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 1 Cls=03(HID ) Sub=01 Prot=02 Driver=syn_cpad
> > E: Ad=83(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 3 Ivl= 10ms
> > I: If#=
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 02:29:56PM +, Rob Miller wrote:
> > > > (1) I just 'grabbed' ioctls 'U' 0x71-0x79 (77-79 in the 0.3 ver at
> It's much better to wrap things like this through a userspace library
> that does not use ioctls. It looks like you
Hi,
it's the guy with the weird LCD mouse thingy again
Greg, can you please put a link to
http://sourceforge.net/projects/usbsnoop/ on the 'tools' page for
linux-usb.org ? 'USB Snoopy' didn't actually catch all the packets for
the cPad, but 'SnoopyPro' on this page did.
thanks,
rob.
Patch against 2.4.20-rc1.
Greg, please apply.
The only change from the previous version is that I got rid of code
duplication between destroy_all_async and destroy_async_on_interface.
I have been running this for a few days now without problems.
Description: When an urb has been submitted via u
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Rob Miller wrote:
> and it's still a 3-button mouse... this may make more sense if I get some
> photos up of the applications so far.
photos at http://www.janerob.com/rob/ts5100/cPad/gallery
rob.
---
This sf.net email
I've just added this to the web pages. It should appear tonight.
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Rob Miller wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> it's the guy with the weird LCD mouse thingy again
>
> Greg, can you please put a link to
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/usbsnoop/ on the 'tools' page for
> linux-usb.org
From: "David Brownell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Stuart MacDonald wrote:
> > The problem boils down to the fact that I can't use urb_list to keep a
> > list of urbs for later unlinking. I'm thinking the best solution is to
> > add a second list_head to struct urb.
>
> You've already got urb->context fo
> but as yet no one's done the really obvious thing, hacking the palm pilot
> emulator to display on the cPad -- except for the newer models the Palm
> display is 160x160, leaving 80 pixels on the side for the "hard"
> buttons! :-)
Well, upon further thought. You shouldn't need to hack anything t
> My experience with the HID driver was that once it grabbed the device I
> couldn't do much with it, in particular I couldn't go in and tell it to
> switch to 'alternate setting 2' on interface 0. I admit to not getting
> very far with libusb, and in a previous message I referred to using an
> '
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Oliver Neukum wrote:
| > but as yet no one's done the really obvious thing, hacking the palm pilot
| > emulator to display on the cPad -- except for the newer models the Palm
| > display is 160x160, leaving 80 pixels on the side for the "hard"
| > buttons! :-)
|
| Well, upon f
> > why do people hate IOCTLs ?
> Different people hate them for different reasons. There is a lot to hate :)
Question: the Linux Telephony API heavily uses ioctls to control
the low level telephone behavior via the driver. Existing
drivers for PCI/ISA/PCMCIA all use this interface.
I am workin
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Brad Hards wrote:
| -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
| Hash: SHA1
|
| On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 20:06, Ian Molton wrote:
| > On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 21:30:29 -0800
| >
| > Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > > > partly because of comments on this list about it being better than
| >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:02, Greg Herlein wrote:
> > > why do people hate IOCTLs ?
> >
> > Different people hate them for different reasons. There is a lot to hate
> > :)
Note the smiley. I find ioctl's are good for some things - they are just easy
to a
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 23:02, Greg Herlein wrote:
> > > why do people hate IOCTLs ?
> > Different people hate them for different reasons. There is a lot to hate :)
>
> Question: the Linux Telephony API heavily uses ioctls to control
> the low level telephone behavior via the driver. Existing
> dr
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:39:45 +1100
Brad Hards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm not the maintainer, but my opinion is that if you have to use
> them, do so. If there is a better way, use that instead.
If theres a better way to do ANYTHING do it instead.
--
This seems to have been lost, so I'm resending it.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 09:41:36 -0800 (PST)
Cc: Rob Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Brad Hards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Synaptics cPad driver mostly there, now what?
On Tue, 19 Nov 20
Yeah, looking at struct urb, transfer_buffer is a void *, so nevermind,
I'll take this patch. Sorry for the noise :)
It's really a bunch of bytes, right? So u8 * would be a better description?
Doesn't "void *" behave better for casts though?
---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:15, Ian Molton wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:39:45 +1100
>
> Brad Hards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm not the maintainer, but my opinion is that if you have to use
> > them, do so. If there is a better way, use that inste
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 04:47:58PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
>
> >>Yeah, looking at struct urb, transfer_buffer is a void *, so nevermind,
> >>I'll take this patch. Sorry for the noise :)
> >
> >It's really a bunch of bytes, right? So u8 * would be a better description?
>
> Doesn't "void *" b
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 04:47:58PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
>
> >>Yeah, looking at struct urb, transfer_buffer is a void *, so nevermind,
> >>I'll take this patch. Sorry for the noise :)
> >
> >It's really a bunch of bytes, right? So u8 * would be a better description?
>
> Doesn't "void *" b
FULL 2002 YAPIMI PORNO VIDEOLAR
Sitemize yeni filmler eklendi. Tam metraj, full kalite
Yenilenen Kategoriler:
AMATEUR
ANAL
ASIAN
LESBIAN
Ýyi eðlenceler,
http://www.noseks.com
id: linux-usb-devel - kkggdqlykjsvtyywncby-
+,~wzf¢+,¦ì¢·o$èæ«Ø^m«"rÊ ±ç.®)àÊ
It's really a bunch of bytes, right? So u8 * would be a better description?
Doesn't "void *" behave better for casts though?
Quite the contrary. Saying "void *" means: "compiler, don't check".
If you have a buffer and declare it "char *", then it cannot be
confused with a "struct urb *urb".
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 20:53:44 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> linux-usb-devel -- confirmation of subscription -- request 454153
>
> We have received a request from 210.172.124.112 for subscription of
> your email address, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, to the
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. To confirm t
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 01:49:20PM +0100, Duncan Sands wrote:
> Patch against 2.4.20-rc1.
>
> Greg, please apply.
Applied, thanks. Could you also make a 2.5 version of this patch?
thanks,
greg k-h
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To l
26 matches
Mail list logo
