This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim).
A message that you sent has not yet been delivered to one or more of its
recipients after more than 36 hours on the queue on chlothar.bnv-bamberg.de.
The message identifier is: 19pv3q-00070Y-00
The subject of the
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Karsten Wiese wrote:
the FIX is to initialise status in uhci_submit_bulk() like this:
/* 3 errors if there is a timeout else 0;
UHCI Spec says: 0 == unlimited errors
VIA-chip 1106:3038 needs 0 for urbs that should not timeout!
*/
status = TD_CTRL_ACTIVE |
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003, Wolfgang Mües wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Karsten Wiese wrote:
the FIX is to initialise status in uhci_submit_bulk() like this:
/* 3 errors if there is a timeout else 0;
UHCI Spec says: 0 == unlimited errors
VIA-chip 1106:3038 needs 0 for urbs that should not
This patch adds support to Kconfig to build ax8817x support into
usbnet. This renames the config option for the existing standalone
ax8817x driver to CONFIG_USB_AX8817X_STANDALONE.
--- linux-2.6.0-test3.orig/drivers/usb/net/Kconfig 2003-08-09 15:05:07.131368024
-0400
+++
On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 10:59:15AM -0400, David T Hollis wrote:
This patch adds support to Kconfig to build ax8817x support into
usbnet. This renames the config option for the existing standalone
ax8817x driver to CONFIG_USB_AX8817X_STANDALONE.
Any reason to keep the standalone driver
Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 10:59:15AM -0400, David T Hollis wrote:
This patch adds support to Kconfig to build ax8817x support into
usbnet. This renames the config option for the existing standalone
ax8817x driver to CONFIG_USB_AX8817X_STANDALONE.
Any reason to keep the
On Saturday 23 August 2003 12:19, Martin Diehl wrote:
[Retry problem on VIA controllers]
I was just going to write a similar reply. IMHO this is an issue which is
generally underestimated. Any long-living transfer might run into this
problem. F.e. if there is an INT IN scheduled to poll some
MailMarshal (an automated content monitoring gateway) has not
delivered the following message:
Message: B00015f320.0001.mml
From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: My details
This is due to automatic rules that have determined that the
message is
