Hello Julian,
> I've based my Superh UDC driver on the pxa2xx_udc. The ep0 handling is
> different (simpler) but the other endpoints are very similar. I didn't
> really look at the net2280 code as it seemed much too complex for my
> device, so I hadn't realised that it does queue management i
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 07:17:49PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Samstag, 4. Oktober 2003 18:09 schrieb David Brownell:
> > Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > >
> > > this ioctl calls usb_unbind_interface() directly. It seems to me that this
> > > will make the driver model's view inconsistent.
> >
> >
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 10:05:52AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> Well, the patch isn't quite correct because if it's not going to probe
> the cache it should set up a write through cache (or disabled cache) as
> the default.
Alan's original patch is included in my patch.
> Patrick's patch
>
>
There haven't been any replies to my suggestion from a week ago
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=106462295800726&w=2
for a way to resolve the mode-sense page 8 problem. One way or another, I
wish somebody would do _something_ about this, particularly before
2.6.0-final comes out.
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 09:18, Alan Stern wrote:
> There haven't been any replies to my suggestion from a week ago
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=106462295800726&w=2
>
> for a way to resolve the mode-sense page 8 problem. One way or another, I
> wish somebody would do _something
From: Mrs Serena Jones
PLEASE ENDEAVOUR TO USED IT FOR THE CHILDREN OF GOD.
I am the above named person from Kuwait. I am married to Dr.Harry Jones who worked
with Kuwait embassy in Ivory Coast for nine yearsbefore he died in the year 2000.We
were married for eleven years without a child. He di
Hi,
Use static declarations for usb_scanner_init/usb_scanner_exit
(Daniele Bellucci).
Bye,
Henning
diff -u -r linux-2.4.23-pre6.device_class/drivers/usb/scanner.c
linux-2.4.23-pre6.static/drivers/usb/scanner.c
--- linux-2.4.23-pre6.device_class/drivers/usb/scanner.c2003-10-03
12:
Hi,
usually this would be too trivial, but is so obviously stupid that
people might think that there's some hidden trick in there.
We should not check for NULL _after_ following a pointer.
Consider it a small tiny step towards cleaning up this code.
Regards
Oliver
You ca
Am Samstag, 4. Oktober 2003 18:09 schrieb David Brownell:
> Oliver Neukum wrote:
> >
> > this ioctl calls usb_unbind_interface() directly. It seems to me that this
> > will make the driver model's view inconsistent.
>
> How?
I was under the impression that driverfs keeps records of associations
Oliver Neukum wrote:
this ioctl calls usb_unbind_interface() directly. It seems to me that this
will make the driver model's view inconsistent.
How?
IMHO this ioctl, is a layering violation and should be replaced in
driverfs.
It's not a layering violation to let user-mode software override
polici
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Smurf wrote:
> The relevant part of the log is:
>
> Oct 4 11:16:44 linux kernel: usb-storage: -- dissociate_dev
> Oct 4 11:16:44 linux kernel: CLASS: Unregistering class device. ID = '0:0:0:0'
> Oct 4 11:16:44 linux kernel: kset_hotplug
> Oct 4 11:16:44 linux kernel: fill_
Hi,
this ioctl calls usb_unbind_interface() directly. It seems to me that this
will make the driver model's view inconsistent.
IMHO this ioctl, is a layering violation and should be replaced in
driverfs. Can I kill it or does it need to be fixed?
Greg, I am locking through usbfs with respect to
Hi,
Alan Stern:
> In turn, scsi_remove_host() calls class_device_unregister() and
> device_del(), and those calls should appear in the debugging log once you
> make the changes listed above. Somewhere in there is where the problem
> lies, and it may take a little work to track it down exactly.
13 matches
Mail list logo
