[linux-usb-devel] Re: bug 2400

On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 04:07:12PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > On Sun, 2004-04-04 at 23:33, Patrick Mansfield wrote: > > How is unregister_cdrom(&cd->cdi) called if the device is not open? > > OK, the attached does everything correctly (as I should have done at > first) by using a kobject to h

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Oops with bluetooth dongle

Alan Stern wrote: The code in hci_usb_unlink_urbs() calls usb_unlink_urb() to perform a synchronous unlink of each pending URB. It then moves each URB to the completed list, and then frees everything on the completed list. By doing this, the code implicitly assumes that when usb_unlink_urb() retu

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: M-Audio USB Quattro on 2.6.x

I've had some time to mess with the three usb config.c patches: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel&m=107937025411336&q=raw http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel&m=107937021027794&q=raw http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel&m=107937029404286&q=raw I've got an MAudio

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Oops with bluetooth dongle

On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 12:33:01AM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > Hi Greg, > > > > many thanks for looking at the problem. I am not an expert when it comes > > > to USB internals, but from your explanation I ask myself why we don't > > > have an unlink function that will wait until the last refer

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Oops with bluetooth dongle

Hi Greg, > > many thanks for looking at the problem. I am not an expert when it comes > > to USB internals, but from your explanation I ask myself why we don't > > have an unlink function that will wait until the last reference to the > > URB is gone. Why do we have to do it in the driver itself?

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Oops with bluetooth dongle

On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 12:49:51PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > I've seen a couple of different problems coming up with this bluetooth > stuff. One of them may be fixed by a recent patch, as David Brownell > mentioned. Below is the relevant part excerpted from that patch; maybe it > will help so

Re: [linux-usb-devel] kernel oops in 2.6.5

On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 01:30:48PM -0700, Daniel Lakeland wrote: > When attempting to run a program that sends data down the Keyspan PDA > usb serial port: > > Kernel 2.6.5 fresh off the kernel.org, it also happened with 2.6.4, > similar errors I think. > > This works with my 2.4.22 kernel. Unfor

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Problem with iPod (USB 2.0) and UDEV (running gentoo)

On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 04:36:38PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hey everyone. I just recently upgraded to UDEV as an alternative to > devfs. MOST things work, but I seem to have trouble with my iPod. I am > using the USB 2.0 setup, and everything worked fine before. In my > script when GTKPOD

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Oops with bluetooth dongle

On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 11:39:06PM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > many thanks for looking at the problem. I am not an expert when it comes > to USB internals, but from your explanation I ask myself why we don't > have an unlink function that will wait until the last reference to the > URB is gone.

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Oops with bluetooth dongle

Hi Alan, > It really is an error in the Bluetooth driver. There's a difference > between the OHCI and UHCI drivers that has the effect of making the error > much less likely when using OHCI. > > In more detail: > > The code in hci_usb_unlink_urbs() calls usb_unlink_urb() to perform a > synchro

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Oops with bluetooth dongle

Alan Stern, Thu, Apr 08, 2004 20:44:21 +0200: > > This is the disassemble. I hope it'll be right. > It was perfect, thank you. > > I think this patch for the USB Bluetooth driver will prevent the > problems you've been seeing. Let me know what happens. i can't reproduce the oops with your patch.

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Oops with bluetooth dongle

On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > Hi Alan, > > > I think this patch for the USB Bluetooth driver will prevent the problems > > you've been seeing. Let me know what happens. > > why do we need a modification of the USB Bluetooth driver? In the case > of using an OHCI based card I don'

[linux-usb-devel] Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim). A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SMTP error from remote mailer after end of data: host

[linux-usb-devel] Re: bug 2400

On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 13:33, Alan Stern wrote: > On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Matt Gulick wrote: > > > OK, Silly question or maybe not. > > > > When writing drivers for MacOS ( 7-9 & X) and Windose (98 - XP) and > when > > I architected the USB 2.0 stack at Adaptec for 98SE, ME & 2k, we > solved > > this

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Oops with bluetooth dongle

Hi Alan, > I think this patch for the USB Bluetooth driver will prevent the problems > you've been seeing. Let me know what happens. why do we need a modification of the USB Bluetooth driver? In the case of using an OHCI based card I don't see any oopses at URB unlink. Regards Marcel -

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Oops with bluetooth dongle

On Thursday 08 April 2004 20:44, Alan Stern wrote: > On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Simone Gotti wrote: > > This is the disassemble. I hope it'll be right. > > It was perfect, thank you. > > I think this patch for the USB Bluetooth driver will prevent the problems > you've been seeing. Let me know what happe

[linux-usb-devel] Re: bug 2400

> There is implicitly _a_ notification, because when the child device is > released it drops its reference to the parent (I still think this would be > better if it were done differently, but never mind). However that doesn't > do the intermediate driver any good, because the driver doesn't ow

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Oops with bluetooth dongle

On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Simone Gotti wrote: > This is the disassemble. I hope it'll be right. It was perfect, thank you. I think this patch for the USB Bluetooth driver will prevent the problems you've been seeing. Let me know what happens. Alan Stern = drivers/bluetooth/hci_usb.c 1.42 vs e

[linux-usb-devel] unneeded SubClass and Protocol entries in unusual_devs.h

usb-storage: This device (054c,0025,0100 S 04 P 01) has unneeded SubClass and Protocol entries in unusual_devs.h It was after connecting Sony portable MP3 Player (don't know model name - I was not mine). -- --- This SF.Net email is sponsor

[linux-usb-devel] Re: bug 2400

On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Matt Gulick wrote: > OK, Silly question or maybe not. > > When writing drivers for MacOS ( 7-9 & X) and Windose (98 - XP) and when > I architected the USB 2.0 stack at Adaptec for 98SE, ME & 2k, we solved > this issue with a simple heart beat task. > > Every so often (1-3 sec

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Oops with bluetooth dongle

On Thursday 08 April 2004 16:47, Alan Stern wrote: > On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Simone Gotti wrote: > > This is my oops, copied by hand because the system hangs and I can't do > > nothing. > > > > PREEMPT > > CPU:0 > > EIP:0060:[] Not tainted > > EFLAGS: 00010002 (2.6.5) > > EIP is at urb_

[linux-usb-devel] Хитрости ежедневного руководства

Уважаемые господа! 15.04.04 состоится однодневный тренинг по теме : «Хитрости ежедневного руководства». Цель мероприятия: оценить стиль руководства каждого участника, научить корректировать стиль руководства в зависимости от характера подчиненного и решаемой задачи. Участники мероприятия научатся

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Oops with bluetooth dongle

On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Erik Tews wrote: > Am Di, den 06.04.2004 schrieb Alan Stern um 22:59: > > Please, folks, don't just say it oopses. Post a crash dump so I have > > some chance of figuring out what's going wrong! > > > > So many people have reported problems with the USB bluetooth driver that

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Oops with bluetooth dongle

On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Simone Gotti wrote: > This is my oops, copied by hand because the system hangs and I can't do > nothing. > > PREEMPT > CPU: 0 > EIP: 0060:[] Not tainted > EFLAGS: 00010002 (2.6.5) > EIP is at urb_unlink+0x2f/0x90 [usbcore] Okay, good. Next, I need you to post a disassembl

[linux-usb-devel] Re: bug 2400

On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Patrick Mansfield wrote: > Much as I hate it, simply adding a lock_kernel in sd_remove would solve > the problem, since do_open uses lock_kernel. On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Mike Anderson wrote: > I believe as indicated above that all cross subsystem registrations need > a release /

[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 2.6.4]: Traveler (Aldi) DC-4300 Digital Still Camera

Hi all! This little patch figured out by Stefan Brink enables the Digital Still Image Camera "Traveler DC-4300" which is aka "Aldi" aka "Yakumo Mega-Image 45". All share the same ID 0x784:0x4300. This patch has been positively tested by three people. See also

[linux-usb-devel] Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reporting-MTA: dns;dhnt18.deheel.zmc Received-From-MTA: dns;dhnt10.deheel.zmc Arrival-Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 12:09:20 +0200 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROT

[linux-usb-devel] InterScan NT Alert

Sender, InterScan has detected virus(es) in your e-mail attachment. Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 12:09:20 +0200 Method: Mail From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] File: message.scr Action: clean failed - deleted Virus: WORM_NETSKY.P ---

[linux-usb-devel] failure notice

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at webair.net. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. vpopmail (#5.1.1) --- Below this line is a c