[linux-usb-devel] 浙江卫生人才网

2005-02-01 Thread 浙江卫生人才网
浙江卫生人才网新增百个职位,百个企业/医院等医疗卫生机构会员。 详情请登录http://www.zjwsrcw.com 找好工作上浙江卫生人才网。 热诚欢迎各大医疗卫生机构、企事业单位前来加盟! 加入浙江卫生人才网请联系: QQ:41240244 电话:0571-85885002 13958100267传真:85332421 欢迎建立友情连接,共同发展! 图片连接代码: http://www.zjwsrcw.com"; title="浙江卫生人才网" target="_blank"> http://www.zjwsrcw.com/img/go.gif"; alt="浙江卫生人才网"

[linux-usb-devel] Maxtor OneTouch Driver

2005-02-01 Thread Nick Sillik
Fellow Linux-Usb-Developers, I have made an official release of the Maxtor OneTouch driver for the linux kernel. Included in the .bz2 file are diffs which are labled as follows: usb.c.diff -- Changes to drivers/usb/storage/usb.c kconfig.diff-- Changes to drivers/u

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Non-working USB port on Compaq Aramada 7400

2005-02-01 Thread Chris Clayton
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 14:38:43 -0800 David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What I think happened is that patch missed something. Specifically, > it didn't prevent the driver from setting the CLF or BLF bits while > the queue is empty because its only endpoint is being descheduled, > but a n

Re: [linux-usb-devel] write protection handling on usb-storage devices

2005-02-01 Thread Olaf Hering
On Tue, Feb 01, Olaf Hering wrote: > CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_RW_DETECT since a while, we have it enabled. I just checked, USB_STORAGE_RW_DETECT appears only once in the source. Cant this be made a module option for usb-storage? So it can be switched on or off at runtime via sysfs. -

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] another broken usb floppy

2005-02-01 Thread Phil Dibowitz
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:21:04PM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, Phil Dibowitz wrote: > > > Okay, lets try this again, shall we? > > > > UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x054c, 0x002c, 0x0601, 0x0601, > > "Sony", > > "USB Floppy Drive", > > US_SC_DEVICE, US_PR_DEVICE, NULL, >

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Non-working USB port on Compaq Aramada 7400

2005-02-01 Thread David Brownell
On Tuesday 01 February 2005 1:16 pm, Chris Clayton wrote: >So the "offending" patch is the one > that took ohci-q.c to revision 1.48. Would it help if I tried to work out > which hunk, or hunks, of that patch cause me the problem? Or is it not > possible to have part(s) of the patch with

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] another broken usb floppy

2005-02-01 Thread Olaf Hering
On Mon, Jan 31, Phil Dibowitz wrote: > Okay, lets try this again, shall we? > > UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x054c, 0x002c, 0x0601, 0x0601, > "Sony", > "USB Floppy Drive", > US_SC_DEVICE, US_PR_DEVICE, NULL, > US_FL_SINGLE_LUN ), > Unfortunately, I dont have the revision numbe

[linux-usb-devel] xpad.c broken behavior

2005-02-01 Thread Dom
ok, I was going to write a (good) patch for this, I was wondering if I could get some feedback before I start. I've reported this before, linux-2.6.x/drivers/usb/input/xpad.c currently treats the xbox controller's directional buttons (D-PAD) as 2 axes instead of 4 digital buttons. this is fine fo

[linux-usb-devel] write protection handling on usb-storage devices

2005-02-01 Thread Olaf Hering
I got an USB stick with write protection switch, writing to it did not work at all. I was told "if the blue LED goes on during plugin, no trouble. But if it remains off, writing gives io errors". Even reading did not work, like md5sum /mnt/$file gave io errors. The odd thing, after a few tries I

[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] usb/io_edgeport: remove interruptible_sleep_on_timeout() usage

2005-02-01 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:43:08AM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 10:57:49AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 04:49:18PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Please consider applying. > > > > > > Description: Use wait_event_timeout(

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Non-working USB port on Compaq Aramada 7400

2005-02-01 Thread Chris Clayton
Hi Dave, Bingo! On Monday 31 Jan 2005 20:36, David Brownell wrote: > > If you want to poke around at that, BitKeeper is your friend. You can > look at the revision history of "ohci-q.c", both on the web (the website > being http://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5) or by running BK locally. > > - Da

[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] usb/mdc800: replace wake_up() with wake_up_interruptible()

2005-02-01 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:51:36AM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 10:58:02AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 01:37:39PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Please consider applying. > > > > > > Description: Use wait_event_timeout(

[linux-usb-devel] [UPDATE PATCH 37/39] usb/mdc800: use wait_event_timeout()

2005-02-01 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 10:58:02AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 01:37:39PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Please consider applying. > > > > Description: Use wait_event_timeout() instead of custom wait-queue code. > > Remove > > now unused variables. > > > >

[linux-usb-devel] [UPDATE PATCH 33/33] usb/io_edgeport: remove interruptible_sleep_on_timeout() usage

2005-02-01 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 10:57:49AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 04:49:18PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Please consider applying. > > > > Description: Use wait_event_timeout() instead of deprecated > > interruptible_sleep_on_timeout(). Signals are not check

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb-storage device registered twice in 2.6.9rc2

2005-02-01 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 18:26:32 +0100, Olaf Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you point me to the patch? http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/diffs/fs/partitions/[EMAIL PROTECTED]|src/|src/fs|src/fs/partitions|hist/fs/partitions/check.c -- Pete

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Problem with usb-ohci.c (2.4.28 kernel)?

2005-02-01 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 10:51:09 -0700, Matthew Lovell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm wondering if any progress was ever made regarding the following > reported issue: > Kernel BUG in 2.4.26 usb-ohci.c using hiddev > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=9106680 Robert Wruck sa

[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] usb-storage: More flexible signature checking mechanism

2005-02-01 Thread Daniel Drake
This patch alters the CSW signature checking code to work with devices that report non-standard signatures, such as some Olympus and Aldi cameras. We now learn the first signature we see, and use it to check signatures of all subsequent transfers. This allows us to continue to benefit from the

[linux-usb-devel] Problem with usb-ohci.c (2.4.28 kernel)?

2005-02-01 Thread Matthew Lovell
Hello, I'm wondering if any progress was ever made regarding the following reported issue: Kernel BUG in 2.4.26 usb-ohci.c using hiddev http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=9106680 I ask since I am also seeing system freezes (oops and panic) seemingly related to an APC UP

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb-storage device registered twice in 2.6.9rc2

2005-02-01 Thread Olaf Hering
On Tue, Feb 01, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 13:16:32 +0100, Olaf Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Any idea why an usb-storage device registers sdb twice? Its a 2.6.9rc2 > > based kernel for SuSE 9.2-x86_64. [...] > > > sdb: assuming drive cache: write through > > sdb: sdb1

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb-storage device registered twice in 2.6.9rc2

2005-02-01 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 13:16:32 +0100, Olaf Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any idea why an usb-storage device registers sdb twice? Its a 2.6.9rc2 > based kernel for SuSE 9.2-x86_64. [...] > sdb: assuming drive cache: write through > sdb: sdb1 > sdb: sdb1 > kobject_register failed for sdb1 (-17

Re: [linux-usb-devel] PS/2 keyboard unusable with SMP and USB enabled

2005-02-01 Thread Alan Stern
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Helge Bahmann wrote: > well, neither atkbd.c nor i8042.c changed apart from cosmetics between > 2.6.7 and 2.6.8; I think this leaves me with either the input system in > general, irq issues in general, or usb > > > Have you tried asking the people in charge of those parts of

Re: [linux-usb-devel] bulk in problem

2005-02-01 Thread Alan Stern
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Marco Schramel wrote: > Hi all, > > my device has 2 bulk and 2 isochron endpoints. > > T: Bus=04 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=01 Cnt=02 Dev#= 3 Spd=12 MxCh= 0 > D: Ver= 1.10 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS=64 #Cfgs= 1 > P: Vendor=0471 ProdID=0168 Rev= 1.00 > C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#=

RE: [linux-usb-devel] bulk in problem

2005-02-01 Thread rao.shalini
Hi, Try to use FILL_BULK to initialize read bulk and give size as exactly as the size of bulk in endpoint packet size. Make sure that your read call back function is recursive it should always keep reading from the device. This should work, Even I faced this problem, right now its ok. Regards

[linux-usb-devel] bulk in problem

2005-02-01 Thread Marco Schramel
Hi all, my device has 2 bulk and 2 isochron endpoints. T: Bus=04 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=01 Cnt=02 Dev#= 3 Spd=12 MxCh= 0 D: Ver= 1.10 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS=64 #Cfgs= 1 P: Vendor=0471 ProdID=0168 Rev= 1.00 C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=c0 MxPwr=100mA I: If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 0 Cls=00(>ifc

[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] - Add ASIX AX88772 10/100 Ethernet support to usbnet - Take 2

2005-02-01 Thread David Hollis
* Add support for the ASIX AX88772 10/100 Ethernet chip * Fix ax8817x_bind to use allocated buffer to avoid DMA on the stack * Fix ax8817x_bind error handling to ensure all resources are freed on failure * Fix ax8817x_get_eeprom routines to return valid eeprom data Kconfig |4 usbnet.c | 40

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb-storage device registered twice in 2.6.9rc2

2005-02-01 Thread Olaf Hering
On Tue, Feb 01, Olaf Hering wrote: > > Any idea why an usb-storage device registers sdb twice? Its a 2.6.9rc2 > based kernel for SuSE 9.2-x86_64. I havent seen this before, havent > asked if current Linus tree works any better. T: Bus=02 Lev=00 Prnt=00 Port=00 Cnt=00 Dev#= 1 Spd=12 MxCh= 3 B

[linux-usb-devel] usb-storage device registered twice in 2.6.9rc2

2005-02-01 Thread Olaf Hering
Any idea why an usb-storage device registers sdb twice? Its a 2.6.9rc2 based kernel for SuSE 9.2-x86_64. I havent seen this before, havent asked if current Linus tree works any better. ... ohci_hcd :03:00.0: wakeup usb 1-2: new full speed USB device using address 2 usb 1-2: Product: Flash Dis

RE: [linux-usb-devel] usbtest 14 fails: is host or gadget theprit?

2005-02-01 Thread Olav Kongas
Alex, before you ask, here is what I found on the chip: NetChip NET2280 rev 1 0234K 2002 Olav --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] sn9c102: reduce ioctl stack usage

2005-02-01 Thread Luca Risolia
Scrive Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 03:46:34PM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > > > > sn9c102_v4l2_ioctl() is the second largest stack user that > > I find (on i386, after joydump_connect()). > > > > This patch just moves the large stack items to separate > > functions so t

[linux-usb-devel] PATCH: Creative WebCam Go mini

2005-02-01 Thread Kiril Jovchev
Hi I have Creative WebCam Go mini. (http://www.qbik.ch/usb/devices/showdev.php?id=2868) This camera has inside STV0680B chip and I have modified one of the kernel drivers (drivers/usb/media/stv680) So I have made this camera supported. A while ago I have send almost the same e-mail to LKML, but

RE: [linux-usb-devel] usbtest 14 fails: is host or gadget the culprit?

2005-02-01 Thread Olav Kongas
Hi Alex, Alan, On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Alex Sanks wrote: > Almost missed this thread. I wish I could get Outlook to actually *run* the > filters I've set up to catch this stuff... Sorry about the poor subject line. > Well, the short answer is that I'm not aware of anything that would be > causing

[linux-usb-devel] Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

2005-02-01 Thread Mail Delivery System
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software NEMESIS/mout on moutng.kundenserver.de[212.227.126.186]. The delivery of the mail below has failed due to the following reasons: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: transmission rejected by 83.246.73.20 command : data transmission response: 550

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb devices have disappeared

2005-02-01 Thread Malcolm Apps
On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 11:00 -0800, David Brownell wrote: > On Monday 31 January 2005 10:49 am, Alan Stern wrote: > > On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Malcolm Apps wrote: > > > > > > > After a bit of rummaging and playing I've come up with a solution that > > > I'm happy with because I can scan and print agai