Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 02:35:40PM -0800, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
Greg - since you're the one in charge of the .11.X tree, perhaps you're
the deciding factor keeping this out? I know .11.X is only for major
fixes, and I won't attempt to argue that patch either way - but perhaps
you can
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 02:35:40PM -0800, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
> Greg - since you're the one in charge of the .11.X tree, perhaps you're
> the deciding factor keeping this out? I know .11.X is only for major
> fixes, and I won't attempt to argue that patch either way - but perhaps
> you can confirm
:::. Оптовая рaспродажa аксессуaров для сотовых телефонов! .:::
!!! супер низкие цены !!!
Зарядные устройства (сетевые и aвтомобильные), корпусa, шнурки, брелки,
чехлы из нaтурaльной кожи, силиконовые и др.
+-- Тел. 8(O95) 68З-49-44 --+
+-- Тел/Фак: 8(O95) 188-89-46 --+
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 11:19:36PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> It seems I forgot MAINTAINERS in my patch that removed this driver...
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Applied, thanks.
greg k-h
---
SF email is sponsored by - T
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 10:48:52PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This patch fixes a check after use found by the Coverity checker.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Applied, thanks.
greg k-h
---
SF email is sponsored by - The
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 11:49:04AM +0200, Colin Leroy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is a resend of a patch that Andrew put in -mm, but that I think is
> ok and should go into mainline. I did not get any feedback (positive or
> negative) about it. Please either apply it or explain why not...
>
> It's curr
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 09:52:31PM -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 20:13:05 -0800 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > There's also a fix for the multilun version, which should fix this in
> > > Greg's
> > > tree, appended to this mail. It may be easier to have Greg
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 11:58:43AM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> Please apply, I missed this conversion.
Thanks, I've applied all four of these patches.
greg k-h
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid re
On Monday 28 March 2005 11:16 am, Alan Stern wrote:
>
> Why would the hub think that? One obvious cause would be the device
> malfunctioning. Another would be the hub malfunctioning. A more likely
> alternative is electrical noise in the cable appearing to be a signal at a
> time when there sh
Please apply, I missed this conversion.
Use milliseconds at the timeout parameter in the call to
usb_bulk_msg() to match the converted interface.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- 2.6.12-rc1-v/sound/usb/usbmidi.c2005-03-28 11:27:26.0 -0800
+++ 2.6.12-rc1/soun
Please apply, I missed this conversion.
Use milliseconds at the timeout parameter in the call to
snd_usb_ctl_msg(), a wrapper to usb_control_msg(), to match
the converted interface.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- 2.6.12-rc1-v/sound/usb/usbaudio.c 2005-03-28 11:27:26
Please apply, I missed this conversion.
Use milliseconds at the timeout parameter in the call to
usb_control_msg() to match the converted interface.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- 2.6.12-rc1-v/drivers/usb/serial/kl5kusb105.c2005-03-28
11:27:19.0 -0800
Please apply, I missed this conversion.
Use milliseconds at the timeout parameter in the call to
usb_control_msg() to match the converted interface.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- 2.6.12-rc1-v/drivers/usb/media/pwc/pwc-ctrl.c 2005-03-28
11:27:19.0 -0800
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005, James Lamanna wrote:
> Earlier I posted about having long delay issues when reading back
> bytes from a FTDI 232BM USB->Serial chip.
> Now, I've noticed that after a long period of time of semi-continual
> use (maybe 8+ hours) I see the following messages in my kernel.log:
>
Earlier I posted about having long delay issues when reading back
bytes from a FTDI 232BM USB->Serial chip.
Now, I've noticed that after a long period of time of semi-continual
use (maybe 8+ hours) I see the following messages in my kernel.log:
Mar 24 23:46:42 displaytest kernel: hub 2-0:1.0: port
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 12:19:36AM +0400, Roman Kagan wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 09:40:48AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 10:43:01AM +0300, Roman Kagan wrote:
> > > > > The patch expects a matching change in scripts/mod/file2alias.c I sent
> > > > > to linux-hotplug-devel
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005, Colin Leroy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is a resend of a patch that Andrew put in -mm, but that I think is
> ok and should go into mainline. I did not get any feedback (positive or
> negative) about it. Please either apply it or explain why not...
>
> It's currently impossible to
Hi,
this is a resend of a patch that Andrew put in -mm, but that I think is
ok and should go into mainline. I did not get any feedback (positive or
negative) about it. Please either apply it or explain why not...
It's currently impossible to associate with a shared-key-only access
point using the
18 matches
Mail list logo
