[linux-usb-devel] Re: High speed device initialization

2005-09-10 Thread Giridhar Pemmasani
Alan Stern wrote: > What did you do to the USB layer? I meant the USB layer in ndiswrapper. The driver for SIS163 required implementation of more USB functions (than what existed earlier in ndiswrapper). > These messages mean that the device did not respond to a 4-byte > control-OUT URB. For an

Re: [linux-usb-devel] High speed device initialization

2005-09-10 Thread Alan Stern
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Giridhar Pemmasani wrote: > I am trying to get Netgear MA111v2 wireless USB card which uses SIS163u > chipset to work with ndiswrapper (tt doesn't have a native driver or > specs). After much reworking of USB layer What did you do to the USB layer? > and other support added

[linux-usb-devel] Re: High speed device initialization

2005-09-10 Thread Giridhar Pemmasani
I forgot to mention that I have tried 2.6.13, 2.6.13-mm1 with the same results. Thanks, Giri --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agi

[linux-usb-devel] High speed device initialization

2005-09-10 Thread Giridhar Pemmasani
I am trying to get Netgear MA111v2 wireless USB card which uses SIS163u chipset to work with ndiswrapper (tt doesn't have a native driver or specs). After much reworking of USB layer and other support added for it in ndiswrapper, the device seems to initialize partially (shows proper MAC address et

Re: [linux-usb-devel] suspend/resume, best approach to avoid power consuption

2005-09-10 Thread Alan Stern
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Luca Risolia wrote: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 05:08:48PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Luca Risolia wrote: > > > > > Do you know what's the best approach to avoid power consuption > > > while an USB2 device is not in use? > > > > At the moment, two solutio

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb_unlink_urb deprecated for synchronous urb use usb_kill_urb

2005-09-10 Thread Alan Stern
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Savita H wrote: > Hi, > > While unlinking the urbs in disconnect function i am calling usb_unlink_urb. > but while unloading i get message as ... > usb_unlink_urb is deprecated for synchronous links ,use usb_kill_urb. > I am using these URBs for asynchronous transmissio

Re: [linux-usb-devel] suspend/resume, best approach to avoid power consuption

2005-09-10 Thread Luca Risolia
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 05:08:48PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Luca Risolia wrote: > > > Do you know what's the best approach to avoid power consuption > > while an USB2 device is not in use? > > At the moment, two solutions occur to me: (1) Write a patch to resume > suspended

[linux-usb-devel] usb_unlink_urb deprecated for synchronous urb use usb_kill_urb

2005-09-10 Thread Savita H
Hi, While unlinking the urbs in disconnect function i am calling usb_unlink_urb. but while unloading i get message as ... usb_unlink_urb is deprecated for synchronous links ,use usb_kill_urb. I am using these URBs for asynchronous transmission of data .I hv set the flags of Urb as URB_ASY

[linux-usb-devel] Re: Fw: Re: 2.6.13-mm2 (general protection fault)

2005-09-10 Thread Dominik Karall
On Saturday 10 September 2005 09:05, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Fri, Sep 09 2005, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Thanks. Either a USB bug or a CFQ bug... > > Try backing out the CFQ ref counting change from Brian King, I have a > suspicion that it still fails in some corner cases. > Yes, right! Reversing t

[linux-usb-devel] Fw: [Bugme-new] [Bug 5215] New: USB OHCI pci card can not enable usb devices.

2005-09-10 Thread Andrew Morton
Begin forwarded message: Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 03:03:15 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Bugme-new] [Bug 5215] New: USB OHCI pci card can not enable usb devices. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5215 Summary: USB OHCI pci card can not enabl

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] usb-storage: Add unusual_devs entry for Neuros Audio MP3 player

2005-09-10 Thread Phil Dibowitz
Daniel Drake wrote: > Alan Stern wrote: > >> If the device sometimes reports the correct values, then you should >> include NEED_OVERRIDE flag to prevent messages about unnecessary >> overrides showing up in the system log. Also, if bInterfaceSubclass >> is correct and only bInterfaceProtocol is

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Module wrappers for binary-only drivers

2005-09-10 Thread Oliver Neukum
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 11:10:12PM +, Luca Risolia wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I have written several drivers for USB/Audio video devices, > > which I would like to share in binary-only form - for now - > > Sorry, but binary kernel modules for Linux a

[linux-usb-devel] Re: Fw: Re: 2.6.13-mm2 (general protection fault)

2005-09-10 Thread Jens Axboe
On Fri, Sep 09 2005, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Thanks. Either a USB bug or a CFQ bug... Try backing out the CFQ ref counting change from Brian King, I have a suspicion that it still fails in some corner cases. diff -puN drivers/block/cfq-iosched.c~cfq_refcnt_fix drivers/block/cfq-iosched.c --- l