On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 21:52 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> You're forgetting something: Devices can be removed at any time, no matter
> what state the host is in. It's even possible for thread A to be removing
> a device while thread B is removing the host. The A thread will interfere
> with the B th
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, xiu zhanyu wrote:
> I connect the Gadget to Windows XP , In Windows XP , do_write()
> crashed very much! so I can't write file to the gadget accurately !!
>
> but, I had a test that connecting the gadget to Windows 2K yesterday
> ,Great! The Wadget work ok! do_write() crash
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 05:08:03PM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 15:57 -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > I haven't had time to review the eh changes, but I was going to reply to
> > > the other one (basically there's a better way to
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, James Bottomley wrote:
> Well, I think the symptoms are racing scsi_remove_host() calls and the
> solution is to enforce the state model on removal (as in if the host is
> already in the remove state, don't try to remove it again).
You're forgetting something: Devices can be
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 16:55 -0700, Mike Anderson wrote:
> James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 15:19 -0700, Mike Anderson wrote:
> > > A side effect of not applying Alan's previous patch that added
> > > SHOST_RECOVERY to the SHOST_CANCEL: state is that we will not m
2005/9/16, Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, xiu zhanyu wrote:
>
> > Alan Stern:
> > I report debug-log, this log track that I copy a file from Host to
> > Device .
> >
>
> I looked at your log, but I can't tell what the problem is. Each time the
> host sends a WRITE
James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 15:19 -0700, Mike Anderson wrote:
> > A side effect of not applying Alan's previous patch that added
> > SHOST_RECOVERY to the SHOST_CANCEL: state is that we will not move to the
> > SHOST_CANCEL and subsequently not to SHOST_DEL st
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 05:08:03PM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 15:57 -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> > I haven't had time to review the eh changes, but I was going to reply to
> > the other one (basically there's a better way to try to close the device
> > add/host remove
Richard Purdie and I have been sending updates for the same
driver... here's a new version of PM support that applies to 2.6.14-rc1
after his "USB PXA-27x OHCI Separate platform code from main driver"
patch. Thanks -- Todd
Power Management for the Intel XScale PXA27x OHCI USB host controller
Sig
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 15:19 -0700, Mike Anderson wrote:
> A side effect of not applying Alan's previous patch that added
> SHOST_RECOVERY to the SHOST_CANCEL: state is that we will not move to the
> SHOST_CANCEL and subsequently not to SHOST_DEL state if the eh is active
> during the start of scsi_
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 08:53:36PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Added support for HUAWEI E600 and Audiovox AirCard
>
> User reports say that these devices work without driver modification.
>
> Signed-Off-By: Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Ugh
James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 15:57 -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> > I haven't had time to review the eh changes, but I was going to reply to
> > the other one (basically there's a better way to try to close the device
> > add/host remove race using the host st
Alan Stern wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Bill Rees wrote:
Hi All,
While working on a driver for an in-house built usb board, I found
that even when the board failed to register the id strings were printed
out. This ended up confusing me for a short while as I expected the
strings to on
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 15:57 -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> I haven't had time to review the eh changes, but I was going to reply to
> the other one (basically there's a better way to try to close the device
> add/host remove race using the host state model).
>
> Let me complete the SCSI process a
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, xiu zhanyu wrote:
> Alan Stern:
> I report debug-log, this log track that I copy a file from Host to
> Device .
>
I looked at your log, but I can't tell what the problem is. Each time the
host sends a WRITE command, the first 512 bytes get written okay but then
the
> There are in fact two distinct but related problems here. One is the
> problem you mention, in which usbcore doesn't call the root-hub-suspend
> methods if CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND isn't set.
Or in fact, ANY hub suspend methods... to be fixed at some point. :)
> But I was talking about a
> diff
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 12:29 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> Ah, thanks for the pointer. SCSI developers, any objections to these
> patches being merged?
I haven't had time to review the eh changes, but I was going to reply to
the other one (basically there's a better way to try to close the device
add/ho
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:41:03 -0400 (EDT), Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Franck wrote:
>
> > OK, I didn't added SCSI disk support in my kernel. It's not
> > automatically selected when selecting USB mass storage driver, is
> > there any reasons ?
>
> Yes. USB mass s
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dominik Karall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Monday 12 September 2005 11:43, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.13/2.6.13
> > >-mm3/
> >
> > hi,
> > again a general protection f
Dominik Karall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Monday 12 September 2005 11:43, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.13/2.6.13
> >-mm3/
>
> hi,
> again a general protection fault...
scsi or USB I guess.
Does the crash happen without loading
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 03:23:11PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > Here's a nice oops I get when removing a usb-storage device with
> > 2.6.14-rc1. I've also created a bug for this for those who like to
> > track bugzilla:
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/sh
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Greg KH wrote:
> Here's a nice oops I get when removing a usb-storage device with
> 2.6.14-rc1. I've also created a bug for this for those who like to
> track bugzilla:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5265
>
> Any ideas?
Patches for this bug plus two othe
Here's a nice oops I get when removing a usb-storage device with
2.6.14-rc1. I've also created a bug for this for those who like to
track bugzilla:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5265
Any ideas?
thanks,
greg k-h
---
hub 1-3:1.0: state 5 ports 4 chg
Added support for HUAWEI E600 and Audiovox AirCard
User reports say that these devices work without driver modification.
Signed-Off-By: Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
---
diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/option.c b/drivers/usb/serial/option.c
--- a
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 03:42:53 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bugme-new] [Bug 5258] New: usb stick has only usb 1.1 speed when it
should be 2.0
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5258
Summary: usb stick has only usb
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Franck wrote:
> 2005/9/15, Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Franck wrote:
> >
> > > OK, I didn't added SCSI disk support in my kernel. It's not
> > > automatically selected when selecting USB mass storage driver, is
> > > there any reasons ?
> >
> > Y
2005/9/15, Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Franck wrote:
>
> > OK, I didn't added SCSI disk support in my kernel. It's not
> > automatically selected when selecting USB mass storage driver, is
> > there any reasons ?
>
> Yes. USB mass storage devices need not be disk drive
2005/9/15, Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Franck wrote:
>
> > Hi Alan
> >
> > Acutally every drivers scsi_mod, sd_mod, and usb-storage are built in
> > the kernel. BTW, does that mean hotplug thing is useless ? I added
> > some traces in the driver, I attached them. Does t
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Franck wrote:
> OK, I didn't added SCSI disk support in my kernel. It's not
> automatically selected when selecting USB mass storage driver, is
> there any reasons ?
Yes. USB mass storage devices need not be disk drives. You might have a
USB DVD drive, so the disk driver i
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Franck wrote:
> Hi Alan
>
> Acutally every drivers scsi_mod, sd_mod, and usb-storage are built in
> the kernel. BTW, does that mean hotplug thing is useless ? I added
> some traces in the driver, I attached them. Does the communication
> look good to you ?
The communication
Hi Alan
Acutally every drivers scsi_mod, sd_mod, and usb-storage are built in
the kernel. BTW, does that mean hotplug thing is useless ? I added
some traces in the driver, I attached them. Does the communication
look good to you ?
Thanks.
--
Franck
minicom.cap
Description: Bina
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Franck wrote:
> Hi !
>
> I have finally implemented a part of my HCD and it seems to
> communicate with the usb stick (a Profilic one) that I have. But I
> don't know how to mount it wihout hotplug. I tried to install udev and
> diethotplug but the whole thing doesn't work fo
Hi !
I have finally implemented a part of my HCD and it seems to
communicate with the usb stick (a Profilic one) that I have. But I
don't know how to mount it wihout hotplug. I tried to install udev and
diethotplug but the whole thing doesn't work for now. I tried:
mknod sda1 b 8 1; mount
Hi!
I am writing a bulk transfer driver for data xfer
through host-to-host xfer cable. I don't want to use
the usbnet driver for the same. This driver is based
on usb-skeleton.c and presently tested with PL-2301
chips.
My problem is that I want the driver binding to happen
for all such kind of
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Giridhar Pemmasani wrote:
> I haven't been able to understand why the transfers fail under Linux whereas
> it works fine under Windows (note that I am using the same Windows driver
> in Linux, albeit with ndiswrapper). All URBs exchanged until the failed URB
> seem to be ident
35 matches
Mail list logo
