Daniel, are you sure about this patch (the second part specifically)?
It directly conflicts with a set of patches in my current tree in this
area that fix all of the reported suspend/resume issues with usb host
controllers (that patch series written by David Brownell.)
Yeah, I see that we should
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Chris Wright wrote:
>
> Sorry, I missed the thread up to this, but this looks fundamentally
> broken. The kill_proc_info_as_uid() idea is not sufficient because more
> than uid/euid are needed for permission check. There's capabilities and
> security labels.
Not for this
* Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Not for this particular USB use, there isn't. Since you can only send a
> signal to yourself anyway, the uid/euid check is just testing that you're
> still who you were.
Ah, I see.
thanks,
-chris
---
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 01:27:05AM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 11:38:35 -0400 (EDT), Alan Stern <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> said:
>
> stern> If that is so, it's a bug in linux-mips. ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN
> stern> is supposed to be at least as large as a cacheline.
Daniel Drake wrote:
> Just noticed that the SDDR-05b entry is missing for the shuttle_usbat
> driver. Looking through BK history it was removed in this patch:
>
> http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> However, at merge time, it looks like the duplicate was already remove
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, David Brownell wrote:
>
> You could try adding
>
> ohci_writel(ohci, OHCI_INTR_MIE, &ohci->regs->intrdisable);
>
> near the end of ohci_pci_suspend().
Btw, wouldn't this make more sense in ohci_hub_suspend()? That would pair
up with the resume, and there seems to
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Harald Welte wrote:
>
> I'm probably the person in this thread who understands the least about
> the USB stack and the scheduler, but if there is no implementation of
> Linus' suggested "PID approach" yet, I'd be willing to write a patch and
> test it. Please let me know.
H
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
How: it forks, the child tries to connect to a non-existing peer, at this
time the parent issues ioctl(HCIDEVDOWN); ioctl(HCIDEVUP); the DOWN wakes
the child up and it dows ioctl(HCIDEVDOWN) too. That's it. On the
USB-analyser I see an incomplete HCI R
Just noticed that the SDDR-05b entry is missing for the shuttle_usbat driver.
Looking through BK history it was removed in this patch:
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, at merge time, it looks like the duplicate was already removed,
compare these two revisions:
A while ago, Matthew Dharm wrote:
Looks good. Tho, I would like to see a future patch to do two things:
1) Change comments from C++ style to C-style
2) Make sure we're naming consistently everywhere SCM, USBAT,
USBAT-02 (most noticably needing fixing is the string used at
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 10:02:16AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Sergey Vlasov wrote:
> >
> > The initial patch added get_task_struct()/put_task_struct() calls to
> > fix this - are they forbidden too?
>
> They are sure as hell not something that a _driver_ is supposed to us
Hi!
SUMMARY: It seems that neither 2.4 or 2.6 kernels support usb-joysticks
from CH products ('yoke' and 'pedals', sold separately). The patch,
http://mail.flightgear.org/pipermail/flightgear-users/2002-November/002571.html
has been available for 3 years but for some reason has not made it
t
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 08:53 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> But it's got a PCI card slot yes? In which case a net2280 PCI card
> can be used...
It does have a PCI slot so that's quite a good idea. Thanks.
Ian.
--
Ian Campbell, Senior Design Engineer
Web: h
This adds US_FL_FIX_CAPACITY for yet _another_ entire block of Apple
productIds. They really can't seem to get this right. This one is for
the iPod Nano. Reported by Tyson Vinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Greg, please apply.
Signed-off-by: Phil Dibowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Phil Dibowitz
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I include the entry to one usb flash disk that had problem here. I
> think is really good to include it on 2.6.14 since its very trivial
> and worked fine here.
I'm not a big fan of doing the entire - range unless you have
some idea that lots of devices
Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> Patch is attached. I would like someone to look it over and challenge it.
> The thing looks too complex to me, but I see no other way. Anyone?
OK, so I'm not very familiar with a lot of the code affected here, but
since it diddles with unusual_devs, I feel I should chime in.
16 matches
Mail list logo
