On Mon, 29 May 2006 22:47:24 +0200
Frank Gevaerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 05:24:10PM -0300, Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino wrote:
| > On Mon, 29 May 2006 21:43:35 +0200
| > Frank Gevaerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| >
| > | On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 02:11:10PM -0300, Luiz
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 12:09:55AM +0400, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> Do you mean paths in patch file? I've changed it to
> new/drivers/usb/serial/
> Is that ok?
Please send it according to Documentation/SubmittingPatches, which
describes the proper way to create and send patches.
thanks,
greg k
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 05:24:10PM -0300, Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino wrote:
> On Mon, 29 May 2006 21:43:35 +0200
> Frank Gevaerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> | On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 02:11:10PM -0300, Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino wrote:
> | >
> | > Frank, could you try this one please?
> | >
On Mon, 29 May 2006 21:43:35 +0200
Frank Gevaerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 02:11:10PM -0300, Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino wrote:
| >
| > Frank, could you try this one please?
| >
| > I have no sure whether this makes sense, but every USB-Serial driver
| > I know exit
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 02:11:10PM -0300, Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino wrote:
>
> Frank, could you try this one please?
>
> I have no sure whether this makes sense, but every USB-Serial driver
> I know exits in the write URB callback if the URB got an error.
It looks sane to me at least.
The ma
On Mon, 29 May 2006 13:25:53 -0300
"Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Mon, 29 May 2006 12:01:02 -0300
| "Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| |
| | Hi Pete,
| |
| | On Fri, 26 May 2006 13:34:10 -0700
| | Pete Zaitcev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 29 May 2006 12:01:02 -0300
"Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| Hi Pete,
|
| On Fri, 26 May 2006 13:34:10 -0700
| Pete Zaitcev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| | On Fri, 26 May 2006 20:22:17 +0200, Frank Gevaerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| |
| | > usb 1-4.5.7:
On Mon, 29 May 2006 11:18:59 -0400 (EDT), Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> This requires RNDIS host to be compiled into kernel itself - it
>> won't work if RNDIS is compiled as module.
Alan> Why do you say that? CONFIG_USB_NET_RNDIS_HOST will be set if
Alan> RNDIS is configured a
On Sun, 28 May 2006, Giridhar Pemmasani wrote:
>
> Since 2.6.16-rc1, when RNDIS devices are not configured; when a device
> is attached, following messages are logged by kernel:
>
> usb 1-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 2
> usb 1-1: default language 0x0409
> usb 1-1: n
Hi Pete,
On Fri, 26 May 2006 13:34:10 -0700
Pete Zaitcev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Fri, 26 May 2006 20:22:17 +0200, Frank Gevaerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| > usb 1-4.5.7: USB disconnect, address 79
| > [ cut here ]
| > kernel BUG at kernel/workqueue.c:110!
|
Hi all,
I have a doubt in RWE and RWC bits of OHCI control register.
According to OHCI specification RWC bit is to indicate whether the
controller supports remote wakeup or not and this bit is set by the
system firmware at the time of POST. But this bit is set in
ohci_bus_resume depending on hc
Hello,
the attached patch against Linux-2.6.17-rc5 adds power management
support for USB OHCI on AU1x00 CPUs.
Ciao,
Rodolfo
--
GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Device Driver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Embedded Systems
From: Milan Svoboda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Include asm/hardware/intel_udc.h instead of asm/arch/udc.h
This patch is against 2.6.17-rc5. This patch must be applied after
[PATCH] ixp4xx: Add platform specific device - pxa2xx_udc.
Please, CC: me because I'm not subscribed on the list.
Signed-off-by:
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 10:34:33AM +, Milan Svoboda wrote:
> From: Milan Svoboda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This patch adds support for pxa2xx_udc. This driver then will be
> usable on ixp4xx platform.
Great work!
One thought: if adding ixp4xx support to pxa2xx_udc, shouldn't we
rename pxa2xx_
From: Milan Svoboda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This patch fixes compile errors when pxa2xx_udc is to be compiled
for ixp4xx platform.
This patch is against 2.6.17-rc5.
Please, CC: me because I'm not subscribed on the list.
Signed-off-by: Milan Svoboda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff -uprN -X orig/Docum
From: Milan Svoboda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This patch adds IXP465 into the list of known devices and
adds IXP425 and IXP465 to the list of devices that have cfr. This
is not described in the hardware documentation, but without
it driver won't work.
Workaround (#if 1) that seemed to get rid of lost
From: Milan Svoboda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This patch removes limitation which prevents use of drivers that support
speeds different that full speed.
This patch is against 2.6.17-rc5.
Please, CC: me because I'm not subscribed on the list.
Signed-off-by: Milan Svoboda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
---
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 08:36:45AM +0200, Veldeman, Jan wrote:
> In some cases the irq may not be requested by usb_add_hcd. E.g. the
> interrupt is shared among different parts of the same driver, and by
> having only 1 handler which calls the others, helps in making the
> driver cleaner.
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
