[linux-usb-devel] Another power budget issue

2006-07-02 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi Alan, A Gentoo bug report has revealed the existence of devices with a MaxPower value of greater than 500mA. If my understanding is correct, these devices will always be rejected by the new configuration choosing code. The bug report is here: http://bugs.gentoo.org/137208 How should we

[linux-usb-devel] new EHCI scheduler and shudtown question / interrupt race

2006-07-02 Thread Christopher Montgomery
I'm putting the finishing touches on the new EHCI scheduler and noticed an interesting 'problem' in shutdown. In practice it usually doesn't work out to being a bug, but it appears to be unintentional and potentially problematic on slow CPUs when a hub with lots of devices is detached. In

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Another power budget issue

2006-07-02 Thread Alan Stern
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Daniel Drake wrote: Hi Alan, A Gentoo bug report has revealed the existence of devices with a MaxPower value of greater than 500mA. If my understanding is correct, these devices will always be rejected by the new configuration choosing code. The bug report is

Re: [linux-usb-devel] new EHCI scheduler and shudtown question / interrupt race

2006-07-02 Thread Alan Stern
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Christopher Montgomery wrote: I'm putting the finishing touches on the new EHCI scheduler and noticed an interesting 'problem' in shutdown. In practice it usually doesn't work out to being a bug, but it appears to be unintentional and potentially problematic on slow CPUs

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Fw: usb-storage device wrongly seen as write protect is on

2006-07-02 Thread DervishD
Hi Alan :) * Alan Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: If I remount it as read-write (as root, of course), I have success and I can use the device normally, being able to write to it without problems. If, instead, I manually unload sd_mod and load it again, then this time the device is

[linux-usb-devel] Fwd: new EHCI scheduler and shudtown question / interrupt race

2006-07-02 Thread Christopher Montgomery
I didn't reply to all. oops. -- Forwarded message -- From: Christopher Montgomery [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Jul 2, 2006 12:17 PM Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] new EHCI scheduler and shudtown question / interrupt race To: Alan Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 7/2/06, Alan Stern [EMAIL

Re: [linux-usb-devel] new EHCI scheduler and shudtown question / interrupt race

2006-07-02 Thread Christopher Montgomery
On 7/2/06, Alan Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't understand the problem you are describing. The kernel doesn't kill off an IRQ unless it gets a lot of unhandled interrupts (99900 out of the last 10). But none of the interrupts you mention will be unhandled -- ehci-hcd will handle

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] Airprime driver improvements to allow full speed EvDO transfers

2006-07-02 Thread Roland Dreier
this works well on my kyocera kpc650 -- throughput is up to about 1 mbit/sec vs. ~250 kbit/sec with the stock airprime driver. Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM

Re: [linux-usb-devel] new EHCI scheduler and shudtown question / interrupt race

2006-07-02 Thread David Brownell
On Sunday 02 July 2006 6:29 am, Christopher Montgomery wrote: Disconnecting a hub/device causes two things to happen at the same time: 1) usb_disconnect is called on the root device. 2) each active transfer descriptor throws an interrupt/error each time it comes up in the periodic

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] Airprime driver improvements to allow full speed EvDO transfers

2006-07-02 Thread Andy Gay
On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 11:48 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: this works well on my kyocera kpc650 -- throughput is up to about 1 mbit/sec vs. ~250 kbit/sec with the stock airprime driver. - Thanks for the feedback. I'm working on fixing the concerns Andrew Morton expressed regarding memory leaks in