On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:05:49AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 10 May 2007, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 02:10:07PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > Greg:
> > >
> > > You have applied most of the patches I sent, but not the "USB-persist"
> > > ones. Any particular reason?
>
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 09:58:15AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 10 May 2007, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 11:56:18AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > From: Danny Budik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > This patch (as899) adds a new ioctl to usbfs: USBDEVFS_GETFRAMENUM.
> > > It
I haven't personally run across an oops because of this, but I feel safer
with this fix in place.
Signed-off-by: Pete Zaitcev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c b/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
index 40cf882..ba141ab 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
@@
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Alan Stern wrote:
> Maybe they don't bother to do so; I'm not familiar with those drivers. So
> all right, I'll write the routine for you.
And here you go. Better check with Greg to see if there's any objection
to exporting driver_probe_device() from the driver core.
I h
Hi Alan,
thanks a lot for your reply.
Alan Stern wrote:
> Your log annotations illustrate this misunderstanding. The "going down"
> and "coming back" parts have nothing to do with Setup vs. Data stages.
> Rather "going down" (or just S) means the message was Submitted to
> usbcore, and "comin
Substitute USB instances of __attribute__ ((unused)) functions with the
newly introduced __maybe_unused.
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/usb/gadget/pxa2xx_udc.h |6 +++---
drivers/usb/host/ehci-dbg.c | 22 +++---
drivers/usb/host/ohci-dbg.c
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Freitag, 11. Mai 2007 20:15 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > > On the contrary. This propblem usually occurs during probe() where it is
> > > handled exactly this way. You return an error.
> >
> > The situations aren't parallel. During probe() the driver is
Am Freitag, 11. Mai 2007 20:15 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > On the contrary. This propblem usually occurs during probe() where it is
> > handled exactly this way. You return an error.
>
> The situations aren't parallel. During probe() the driver is supposed to
> test the device to make sure it really
Hi,
I apologize if this has already been reported, I didn't find anything
with a quick search in the archives. I have been looking at the EHCI
code in 2.6.18 and found this:
In 2.6.18 ehci_irq() [1], starting at line 619 the code looks like this:
/* remote wakeup [4.3.1] */
619 i
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> You are asking drivers to do something what some of them cannot do
> in principle. To restore state from scratch you need to know the state
> the device was in. Many drivers cannot know that.
>
> > Now perhaps you would like to add a subroutine to the
Thanks. I will look at this one, too, this weekend.
-- Al
Quoting Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> you are submitting an URB with GFP_KERNEL holding a spinlock.
> In this case the spinlock can be dropped earlier.
>
> Regards
> Oliver
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Neuku
Thanks. I will look at this patch this weekend.
-- Al
Quoting Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> this fixes the flushing trouble due to its own buffering for this driver.
>
> Regards
> Oliver
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> --
>
> --- a/drivers
Am Freitag, 11. Mai 2007 16:27 schrieb Alan Stern:
> On Fri, 11 May 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > it seems to me that you have to allow for drivers failling to restore
> > their devices' state. The obvious way would be to let post_reset()
> > return an error code and treat failure
Am Mittwoch, 9. Mai 2007 17:09 schrieb Alan Stern:
> On Wed, 9 May 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
> > Am Dienstag, 8. Mai 2007 23:59 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > > On Tue, 8 May 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > >
> > > > Am Dienstag, 8. Mai 2007 20:59 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > > > > > 2. I would prefer to h
On Fri, 11 May 2007, James Graves wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> We've started out testing of suspend / resume support for the Sierra
> Wireless modem driver. For the testing, we're just putting the laptop
> into hibernate mode. Suse 10.2 with the 2.6.21 kernel from kernel.org.
This is not a g
On Friday 11 May 2007, James Graves wrote:
>
> We've started out testing of suspend / resume support for the Sierra
> Wireless modem driver. For the testing, we're just putting the laptop
> into hibernate mode.
>
> ...
>
> However, upon resume, the system appears to be completely disconn
Hello Everyone,
We've started out testing of suspend / resume support for the Sierra
Wireless modem driver. For the testing, we're just putting the laptop
into hibernate mode. Suse 10.2 with the 2.6.21 kernel from kernel.org.
However, things aren't working quite as expected with the USB seri
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it seems to me that you have to allow for drivers failling to restore
> their devices' state. The obvious way would be to let post_reset()
> return an error code and treat failure as unplug.
To begin with, you don't want to trait failure as unp
This patch (as905) removes a micro-optimization from the hub port
initialization code. Previously we had been using a short timeout on
the first attempt the read the device descriptor; now we will use the
standard timeout length.
It's not clear that the short timeout ever provided any benefit. A
On Thu, 10 May 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 02:10:07PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > Greg:
> >
> > You have applied most of the patches I sent, but not the "USB-persist"
> > ones. Any particular reason?
>
> The main reason is that I'm still on the road, and I really want to
>
On Thu, 10 May 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 11:56:18AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > From: Danny Budik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > This patch (as899) adds a new ioctl to usbfs: USBDEVFS_GETFRAMENUM.
> > It allows user programs to obtain the current Start-Of-Frame number on
> > a
For MPC831x support, change the ehci-fsl driver to preserve
bits set in platform code. Add a common CONFIG_USB_EHCI_FSL
to indicate presence of Freescale EHCI SOC. Add FSL_USB2_DR_OTG
operating mode support, thus both host and device can work for the
mini-ab receptacle. Note: this doesn't enable
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/Kconfig b/drivers/usb/host/Kconfig
> > > index 6271187..8da3185 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/host/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/Kconfig
> > > @@ -72,6 +72,12 @@ config USB_EHCI_BIG_ENDIAN_MMIO
> > > depends on USB_EHCI_HCD
> > > default n
> > >
> > >
> -Original Message-
> From: David Brownell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 4:03 PM
> To: Li Yang-r58472
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ehci_fsl update for MPC831x support
>
> On Wednesday 09 May 2007, Li Yang wr
On Wednesday 09 May 2007, Li Yang wrote:
> For MPC831x support, change the ehci-fsl driver to preserve
> bits set in platform code. Add a common CONFIG_USB_EHCI_FSL
> to indicate presence of Freescale EHCI SOC. Add FSL_USB2_DR_OTG
> operating mode support, thus both host and device can work for t
Hi,
it seems to me that you have to allow for drivers failling to restore
their devices' state. The obvious way would be to let post_reset()
return an error code and treat failure as unplug.
Regards
Oliver
--
26 matches
Mail list logo