[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] zr364xx: fix return values

2007-05-20 Thread Akinobu Mita
This patch fixes several return value related problems in zr364xx. - return -ENOMEM instead of -ENODEV on out of memory - zr364xx checks video_register_device() error only when its return value is -1. But video_register_device() doesn't always return -1 on error. - If usb_register() returns

[linux-usb-devel] 2.6.22-rc2 built on ppc

2007-05-20 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
Hi, FYI, building the kernel modules with gcc (GCC) 4.1.3 20070514 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-7) on my powerbook (PPC) gives: ... drivers/usb/gadget/net2280.c: In function 'net2280_probe': erivers/usb/gadget/net2280.c:2967: warning: ignoring return value of 'pci_set_mwi', declared with

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] zr364xx: fix return values

2007-05-20 Thread Antoine Jacquet
Akinobu Mita wrote: This patch fixes several return value related problems in zr364xx. ACK. Mauro, the patch should be in my hg tree, can you pull it to the main tree please? Akinobu, thank you for the patch. Regards, Antoine -- Antoine Royale Jacquet http://royale.zerezo.com - return

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Who is currently usb.ids maintainer?

2007-05-20 Thread Randy Dunlap
redirecting to usb list: On Sun, 20 May 2007 13:24:51 +0200 CIJOML wrote: Hi guys, can anybody help me find current usb.ids maintainer? David Brownell is not responding and latest official version is 5 mounths old. I could take ownership if nobody takes care. Thanks for reply

[linux-usb-devel] Please reactivate your Yahoo! Groups email address

2007-05-20 Thread Yahoo!Groups
Dear Yahoo! Groups member, You belong to one or more email groups provided by Yahoo! Groups (groups.yahoo.com). Recently, messages sent to you from Yahoo! Groups have been returned to us as undeliverable. As a result, we have temporarily turned off message delivery to this email address. If

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Who is currently usb.ids maintainer?

2007-05-20 Thread David Brownell
On Sunday 20 May 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote: On Sun, 20 May 2007 13:24:51 +0200 CIJOML wrote: can anybody help me find current usb.ids maintainer? http://www.linux-usb.org/usb.ids says at the top that it's (drum roll): [EMAIL PROTECTED] David Brownell is not responding He is

Re: [linux-usb-devel] 2.6.22-rc2 built on ppc

2007-05-20 Thread David Brownell
On Sunday 20 May 2007, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: Hi, FYI, building the kernel modules with gcc (GCC) 4.1.3 20070514 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-7) on my powerbook (PPC) gives: ... drivers/usb/gadget/net2280.c: In function 'net2280_probe': erivers/usb/gadget/net2280.c:2967: warning:

Re: [linux-usb-devel] 2.6.22-rc2 built on ppc

2007-05-20 Thread Alan Stern
On Sun, 20 May 2007, David Brownell wrote: On Sunday 20 May 2007, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: Hi, FYI, building the kernel modules with gcc (GCC) 4.1.3 20070514 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-7) on my powerbook (PPC) gives: ... drivers/usb/gadget/net2280.c: In function

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 0/6] Composite Gadget Support

2007-05-20 Thread Alan Stern
On Sat, 19 May 2007, Ragner Magalhaes wrote: The following series implements USB Composite Gadget Support. [PATCH 1/6] USB gadget driver. [PATCH 2/6] Composite gadget driver. [PATCH 3/6] Composite gadget driver upgrade. [PATCH 4/6] Kconfig modifications for USB Composite gadget support.

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [4/5] 2.6.22-rc2: known regressions

2007-05-20 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-rc2. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions Suspend Subject: STD fails with pci_device_suspend(): usb_hcd_pci_suspend+0x0/0x160 [usbcore]() returns -16 References :

[linux-usb-devel] [post 2.6.20] Long delay between speedtch and firmware loading

2007-05-20 Thread Indan Zupancic
Hello, Perhaps best explained with some dmesg output: [ 48.309884] usbcore: registered new interface driver speedtch [ 48.332337] PPP generic driver version 2.4.2 [...] [ 108.304338] speedtch 2-1:1.0: found stage 1 firmware speedtch-1.bin [ 108.479843] speedtch 2-1:1.0: found stage 2

Re: [linux-usb-devel] autosuspend for hid

2007-05-20 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Mittwoch, 16. Mai 2007 15:41 schrieb Jiri Kosina: On Wed, 16 May 2007, Pete Zaitcev wrote: I did not verify the function in detail, but the patch looks sane at a quick glance. Hi Pete and Oliver, (BTW, why was I again dropped from CC? :) ) I consider the things below crucial

Re: [linux-usb-devel] anchors and their use

2007-05-20 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Mittwoch, 16. Mai 2007 17:30 schrieb Alan Stern: On Wed, 16 May 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote: Hi Alan, list, here's the patch to introduce anchors for use with fire-and-forget techniques and a modification for the skeleton driver to use them. This should make implementing

[linux-usb-devel] [RFC] linux-2.6.22-rc2. SLUB report[kzalloc(0)]

2007-05-20 Thread Dan Kruchinin
Hi. There is a BUG message from SLUB during boot process: -- May 21 05:39:10 midgard kernel: [ 31.177484] BUG: at include/linux/slub_def.h:77 kmalloc_index() May 21 05:39:10 midgard kernel: [ 31.178355] [c01062ca] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30 May 21 05:39:10 midgard kernel: [ 31.179263]

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 2.6.21] Work around for PPC440EPX USBH_23 errrata

2007-05-20 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Fri, 18 May 2007 14:23:43 -0700, Mark Miesfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a published errata for the PPC440EPX, USBH_23: EHCI and OHCI Linux module contention. The overview states: When running Linux with both EHCI and OHCI modules loaded, the EHCI module experiences a fatal error

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 2.6.21] Work around for PPC440EPX USBH_23 errrata

2007-05-20 Thread David Brownell
On Sunday 20 May 2007, Pete Zaitcev wrote: On Fri, 18 May 2007 14:23:43 -0700, Mark Miesfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And this is the part which implements poking: +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ohci-ppc-soc.c @@ -20,6 +20,37 @@ #include linux/signal.h /* always called with process context;

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 2.6.21] Work around for PPC440EPX USBH_23 errrata

2007-05-20 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Sun, 20 May 2007 21:55:58 -0700, David Brownell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you're going to turn on the OHCI hardware, do it the normal way; don't bypass its driver. How exactly do you suggest we do this? The problem is not quite dissimilar to that of BIOS handoff. There, we solved the