Re: [linux-usb-devel] [Bugme-new] [Bug 8681] New: USB printer autosuspend breaks Samsung ML-2510

Am Freitag, 29. Juni 2007 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Hi Oliver, > > On 2007-06-27 02:15, Oliver Neukum wrote: > >>> I've narrowed it down the following patch, introduced in 2.6.20: > >>> > >>>   d0532184086906889f4a0cd92eade1f7be49fbac > >>>   USB: autosuspend for usb printer driver > >>> > >>>

[linux-usb-devel] [patch]quirk for samsung printer

Hi, this printer does not survive suspension. Regards Oliver Signed-off-by: Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- a/drivers/usb/core/quirks.c 2007-06-29 08:34:12.0 +0200 +++ b/drivers/usb/core/quirks.c 2007-06-29 08:38:30.0 +0200 @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ sta

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] USB IAD Support (kernel2.6.21.3)

Greg KH wrote: Please also update the documentation for the usbfs file in Documentation/usb/proc_usb_info.txt as you added a new line to that file. You can just send that as a follow-on patch, as I've added this one to my tree now. The IAD usbfs doc patch is against kernel 2.6.22-rc6. Crai

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] USB: ehci_hub_control() (Kernel 2.6.21.4)

This version of the patch is against kernel 2.6.22-rc5 and has been checked with scripts/checkpatch.pl and sparse. Craig From: Craig W. Nadler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> EHCI_HUB_CTRL: Fixes a bug with setting the value of the port number. The ehci_hub_control() function in driver/usb/host/ehci-hub.

[linux-usb-devel] Writing big file failed when using usb gadget g_file_storage module

Dear all: When I use the g_file_strogae.ko module, I failed to write big file to the disk. Hardware platform: CPU: S3C2440A SDRAM: 32M sdram Kernel:2.6.21.3 with s3c2410_udc patch

[linux-usb-devel] Virus "W32.Sality.Q-1" gefunden

Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, in dem E-Mail mit dem Betreff '[linux-usb-devel] Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender' (gesendet am Thu, 28 Jun 2007 22:45:57 -0400) mit der angegebenen Absenderadresse 'Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' wurde der Virus 'W32.Sality.Q-1' gefunden

Re: [linux-usb-devel] High speed devices with kernel 2.6.21.5.

On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Branden Sletteland wrote: > I am seeing an issue when going from kernel version 2.6.20.14 to > 2.6.21 through 2.6.21.5 were my high speed devices are only being > recognized as full speed devices, with error output on a 2.6.21 kernel > stating: > > usb 3-1: new full speed USB

Re: [linux-usb-devel] cdrom buffer i/o error on heavily loaded system

On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Alex Chiang wrote: > Hello, > > I have a Teac DV-28E-N cdrom, and I've been seeing some buffer > I/O errors on a heavily loaded system (uptime indicates system > load of 390 or so). > > Turning on USB debugging for usbcore and mass storage indicates > that something is timin

Re: [linux-usb-devel] What does USB_DT_HUB_NONVAR_SIZE mean?

On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, jidong xiao wrote: > Sorry I cannot find this in usb 2.0 spec. It isn't in the USB 2.0 spec. That's why you can't find it. :-) > But inside the code,drivers/usb/core/hub.c: > 103 /* USB 2.0 spec Section 11.24.4.5 */ > 104 static int get_hub_descriptor(struct usb_de

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] Add usb_setup_{control, bulk, int}_urb helpers

On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > the attached patch is an attempt for usb_alloc_bulk_urb() which will > allocate the URB itself and its transfer buffer. It also use the > endpoint data structure to create the pipe value. Please review it. > > I can create the other helper functions i

[linux-usb-devel] USB: cdc-subset.c support for new vendor/product ID

Send to the lists on behalf on Jing, Any comment is welcome. Thanks -stanley -- hi, Here's one patch for cdc subset to support new vendor/product ID. Could you help to check whether it is accaptable or not? Thanks a lot! Signed-off-by: Jing Xiang<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -uN

[linux-usb-devel] Please reactivate your Yahoo! Groups email address

Dear Yahoo! Groups member, You belong to one or more email groups provided by Yahoo! Groups (groups.yahoo.com). Recently, messages sent to you from Yahoo! Groups have been returned to us as undeliverable. As a result, we have temporarily turned off message delivery to this email address. If

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] PXA27x UDC driver.

By the way, there are three or four versions of a pxa27x UDC driver floating around; which one is this? One you updated? It looks like it forked from the pxa2xx driver several years ago but never got cleaned up ... e.g. it's a different controller, so none of the comments relevant to earlier con

[linux-usb-devel] High speed devices with kernel 2.6.21.5.

I am seeing an issue when going from kernel version 2.6.20.14 to 2.6.21 through 2.6.21.5 were my high speed devices are only being recognized as full speed devices, with error output on a 2.6.21 kernel stating: usb 3-1: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 11 usb 3-1: not running a

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] PXA27x UDC driver.

On Thursday 28 June 2007, Rodolfo Giometti wrote: > As suggest by Leo let me propose to you my new patch for PXA27x UDC > support. > > Please, let me know what I have to do for kernel inclusion. :) Let's start with *JUST* a driver, not trying to update everything else in the USB Gadget stack so

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] PXA27x UDC driver.

On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:12:07 +0200 Rodolfo Giometti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 07:15:06PM +0800, Li Yang-r58472 wrote: > > > You should probably also cc: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net and > > David Brownell for UDC matters. > > As suggest by Leo let me propose t

[linux-usb-devel] medical data

Here is the info for the lists you needed: This below package is good until June 29th: * DOCTORS: 788,800 doctors in the USA. Data is provided in Excel format and is sortable by state or specialty. Over a dozen different fields and 34 specialties. Item Price: $379 * HOSPITALS: 23,

[linux-usb-devel] cdrom buffer i/o error on heavily loaded system

Hello, I have a Teac DV-28E-N cdrom, and I've been seeing some buffer I/O errors on a heavily loaded system (uptime indicates system load of 390 or so). Turning on USB debugging for usbcore and mass storage indicates that something is timing out (hanging?), which makes the SCSI mid-layer issue an

[linux-usb-devel] Tonight on ET : Paris Out of Jail

If you can't persuade ur girl that she deserves only your tiny size, so, never mind, just try out our wonderful pellet and you'll show your girlfriend a REAL SIZE! You can find out how to do it on our official website: http://www.kdkqf.com/ and it's REALLY CHEAPER! -- gljsjqjskgksfqkhkqjqfmj

[linux-usb-devel] What does USB_DT_HUB_NONVAR_SIZE mean?

Sorry I cannot find this in usb 2.0 spec. But inside the code,drivers/usb/core/hub.c: 103 /* USB 2.0 spec Section 11.24.4.5 */ 104 static int get_hub_descriptor(struct usb_device *hdev, void *data, int size) 105 { 106 int i, ret; 107 108 for (i = 0; i < 3; i+

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] Add usb_setup_{control, bulk, int}_urb helpers

Hi Alan, > > Sounds even more useful. Better abandon the halfway wrappers for the new > > ones. Another thing I'd think may be useful is to take the endpoint > > address instead of the pipe, because the pipe type is known to each > > wrapper, right? > > I'm in favor of doing away with pipe values

Re: [linux-usb-devel] question on the lifecycle of struct ed in ohci driver

On Thursday 28 June 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 28. Juni 2007 schrieb David Brownell: > > On Thursday 28 June 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > am I seeing this correctly that struct ed is allocated the first time an > > > URB > > > is submitted for the ed's endpoin

Re: [linux-usb-devel] question on the lifecycle of struct ed in ohci driver

Am Donnerstag, 28. Juni 2007 schrieb David Brownell: > On Thursday 28 June 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > Hi, > > > > am I seeing this correctly that struct ed is allocated the first time an URB > > is submitted for the ed's endpoint and is freed when the endpoint is > > disabled? > > That's the

Re: [linux-usb-devel] question on the lifecycle of struct ed in ohci driver

On Thursday 28 June 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Hi, > > am I seeing this correctly that struct ed is allocated the first time an URB > is submitted for the ed's endpoint and is freed when the endpoint is disabled? That's the idea. > > Regards > Oliver > ---

[linux-usb-devel] question on the lifecycle of struct ed in ohci driver

Hi, am I seeing this correctly that struct ed is allocated the first time an URB is submitted for the ed's endpoint and is freed when the endpoint is disabled? Regards Oliver - This SF.net email is sp