Re: [linux-usb-devel] Problem with 2GB card using USB SD card reader

2007-08-04 Thread Matthew Dharm
Can you do the following: 1) Dump the partition table with fdisk, and send it to us 2) Turn on USB_STORAGE_VERBOSE_DEBUG, capture the log from inserting the card and capacity scan, and send it to us Matt On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 12:10:07PM -0700, Jason LeBrun wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm using a K

[linux-usb-devel] Problem with 2GB card using USB SD card reader

2007-08-04 Thread Jason LeBrun
Hi there, I'm using a Kingston 2.0GB SD card with a unbranded card reader (model number UCR-61). When I insert the card, it's detected as device using 512-byte sector sizes, and therefore it only shows up with about 1GB. I've poked around the mailing list, and I've found that a few other people h

Re: [linux-usb-devel] question about running linux USB ether gadget driver on Cirrus ep9315A development board

2007-08-04 Thread David Brownell
On Friday 03 August 2007, Lorenzo T. Flores wrote: > > Anyways, for a while now, I've been trying to get the ethernet gadget > driver working on a Cirrus EP9315A development board contains the > Phillips ISP1581 usb device controller. There is no drivers/usb/gadget/isp1581.c driver ... > The

[linux-usb-devel] Precise Parts Machining:China Shop

2007-08-04 Thread yada_eng5
Work for Precise & Special Parts Machining We are a China machine Shop and we make parts from all kinds of materials: aluminum,cooper,SS(stainless), etc. to meet harsh demand while save your 50%. We own: 4 sets of CNC machining Centers 6 sets of CNC lathes

[linux-usb-devel] Virus "W32.Sality.Q-1" gefunden

2007-08-04 Thread Inode Mailscan
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, in dem E-Mail mit dem Betreff '[linux-usb-devel] Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender' (gesendet am Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:49:31 +0200) mit der angegebenen Absenderadresse 'Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' wurde der Virus 'W32.Sality.Q-1' gefunden

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] USB: Only enable autosuspend by default on certain device classes

2007-08-04 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 15:29:21 -0400, Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, we did - with hindsight it may not have been such a great plan :) > > I believe that Fedora did as well, but have disabled it in an update > > kernel. > > Yeah, autosuspend broke too many devices. Way too many

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] USB: Only enable autosuspend by default on certain device classes

2007-08-04 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 05:31:52PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: > > Plus if you're connected to such a device for monitoring purposes you're > > probably powered by it as well, so you have little to gain from suspend > > even if it works. > > I currently don't have any HID UPS by hand to veri

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] USB: Only enable autosuspend by default on certain device classes

2007-08-04 Thread Adam Kropelin
Dave Jones wrote: > On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 05:31:52PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: > >>> Plus if you're connected to such a device for monitoring purposes >>> you're probably powered by it as well, so you have little to gain >>> from suspend even if it works. >> >> I currently don't have any HID UPS

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] USB: Only enable autosuspend by default on certain device classes

2007-08-04 Thread David Brownell
On Friday 03 August 2007, Dave Jones wrote: >  > > Plus if you're connected to such a device for monitoring purposes you're >  > > probably powered by it as well, so you have little to gain from suspend >  > > even if it works. >  > >  > I currently don't have any HID UPS by hand to verify, but

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] USB: Only enable autosuspend by default on certain device classes

2007-08-04 Thread Jiri Kosina
On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, Adam Kropelin wrote: > Although I have no proof immediately at hand, I suspect at a minimum HID > power class devices should be blacklisted from autosuspend. Given the > spotty USB implementations on many such devices I'd be surprised if > suspend worked reliably. I agree

[linux-usb-devel] 2.6.23-rc1-mm2 + cpufreq patch + hot-fixes -- [] usb_stor_scan_thread+0xbd/0x15a [usb_storage]

2007-08-04 Thread Miles Lane
usb usb4: usb resume ehci_hcd :00:1d.7: resume root hub hub 4-0:1.0: hub_resume hub 4-0:1.0: state 7 ports 6 chg evt ehci_hcd :00:1d.7: GetStatus port 3 status 001803 POWER sig=j CSC CONNECT hub 4-0:1.0: port 3, status 0501, change 0001, 480 Mb/s hub 4-0:1.0: debounce: port 3: tot

Re: [linux-usb-devel] About current state of supporting USB selective suspend feature

2007-08-04 Thread gutian abei
Our device's enumeration has four phases: 1,report vid/pid 0x/0x 2,broken from host after 10 seconds 3,report vid/pid 0x/0x 4,working now In fedora 7, our device stoped at phase 1. I don't know why. Abei From: David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: linux-usb-devel@lists.sou

Re: [linux-usb-devel] rt2500usb stopped working (vendor request error)

2007-08-04 Thread dragoran
Ivo van Doorn wrote: > On Saturday 04 August 2007, Luis Correia wrote: > >> Well, it may be an hardware error you got on your stick. >> > > Nope, very doubtfully. > When he is using the latest version there would be a big warning > "Not an rt2500usb device" and the driver would halt loading

Re: [linux-usb-devel] rt2500usb stopped working (vendor request error)

2007-08-04 Thread Ivo van Doorn
On Saturday 04 August 2007, Luis Correia wrote: > Well, it may be an hardware error you got on your stick. Nope, very doubtfully. When he is using the latest version there would be a big warning "Not an rt2500usb device" and the driver would halt loading after that. > That or it is one of those w

Re: [linux-usb-devel] rt2500usb stopped working (vendor request error)

2007-08-04 Thread Luis Correia
Well, it may be an hardware error you got on your stick. That or it is one of those wrongly named sticks which are actually rt73... but i don't really know. One last test you could do, go to a friend that uses Windoze and see if it works as a client and if yes, which driver did it detect, rt73 or

[linux-usb-devel] [patch] visor add ACER S10 palm

2007-08-04 Thread maximilian attems
modprobe visor vendor=0x502 product=0x1 is said to work, plus there are patch instructions for it. fixes http://bugs.debian.org/340547 see http://www.chinaitpower.com/A/2004-07-28/87909.html Signed-off-by: maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/usb/serial/visor.c |2 ++ drivers/u

Re: [linux-usb-devel] rt2500usb stopped working (vendor request error)

2007-08-04 Thread dragoran
Ivo van Doorn wrote: > On Friday 03 August 2007, dragoran wrote: > >> thats what I am using it for >> > > I understand, but if you could test the legacy driver > for any other mode to see if at least the hardware is > all right. > Managed and adhoc mode would already give a good > idea