On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 12:18:16AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > if I claim the interface with usb_driver_claim_interface, will usbfs
> > respect it? ?There are only a handful of userspace drivers for this
> > device out there.. and I'm pretty sure they're not active during the
> > test.
>
> Con
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 04:59:17PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> Ah, but other programs may be accessing your device through usbfs without
> your knowledge, without using your driver, and without being stopped by
> your semaphore! For example, any time you do "cat /proc/bus/usb/devices"
> the cat
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 03:49:43PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > Since the linux-usb implementation is 100% bug-free, my code is the
> > bug's likely home. Should I be holding any locks when I call
> > usb_control_msg() or usb_bulk_msg()?
>
> You certainly shouldn't hold any spinlocks, since those
Hey Alan,
Unfortunately I haven't had any luck fixing this timing issue, so I've
returned to seek wisdom and guidance. I've tried:
-capping the average transfer speed in my driver
-looking for similar behaviour in the Windows driver
Everything I've observed* suggests (to me) a l
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 03:46:09PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > > 90% of the time, I can
> > > > work around by re-issuing the request (once). But the other 10% of the
> > > > time, *both* requests succeed--even the original one that returned
> > > > -EPIPE.
> > >
> > > How do you know the req
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 11:16:06AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > One of my control messages is returning 'EPIPE' when my system is under
> > heavy load. I'm stumped; does anyone have any suggestions?
>
> You're working on a kernel driver for this device, right? What does the
> device do?
The dr
Hi there,
One of my control messages is returning 'EPIPE' when my system is under
heavy load. I'm stumped; does anyone have any suggestions?
It's not an endpoint stall (clear_halt() fails). 90% of the time, I can
work around by re-issuing the request (once). But the other 10% of the
time, *bot
Hello,
This patch is against linux-2.6.0-test8 and adds support for WACOM
Graphire3 tablets. I've tested it with my 4x5 tablet, and I also added
code for the 6x8 models. Can anyone confirm this works for 6x8s?
Many thanks,
Geoff
--patch follows--
diff -Naur linux-2.6.0-test8/drivers/usb/inpu
