Re: [linux-usb-devel] Zonet ZUN2210

2007-06-18 Thread James Painter
Jon Smirl wrote: > Has anyone tried the Zonet ZUN2210 USB to Ethernet adapter? What > chipset is it using? > http://www.zonetusa.com/DispProduct.asp?ProductID=81 > > Googling doesn't give a conclusive answer if it works with Linux. > Based on the vendor/product info in the windows driver .inf f

Re: [linux-usb-devel] AX88772 based adapter stops receiving in kernel 2.6.13

2005-09-05 Thread James Painter
Paulo Marques wrote: James Painter wrote: [...] The attached patch repairs this. Apply it after the Brownell patches. Let us know if it fixes your problem. Unfortunately it doesn't :( I can confirm that it does only happen in half-duplex mode. Full-duplex connections seem to work

Re: [linux-usb-devel] AX88772 based adapter stops receiving in kernel 2.6.13

2005-09-03 Thread James Painter
James Painter wrote: I spent some time looking at this today ... I found that the link_reset didn't re-establish link correctly when I just moved that cat5 cable between the switch and the hub, but on a fresh usb hotplug, it did connect and run stable for me. I found a rather stupid

Re: [linux-usb-devel] AX88772 based adapter stops receiving in kernel 2.6.13

2005-09-03 Thread James Painter
Paulo Marques wrote: Paulo Marques wrote: [...] I can insert a few printk's into the driver and recompile / retest, but where should I insert what to produce useful information? Well, I've inserted a few debug statements in some places I thought should give useful information, but I still

[linux-usb-devel] [Trial Patch] - fixes for ASIX devices in the recently refactored usbnet

2005-08-19 Thread James Painter
This patch is against the current torvalds git tree with usb-usbnet-gfp_flags-fix.patch and David Brownell's nine usbnet modularization patches applied. I found that the modularization patches broke the ax88772 framing code. The rx urb's were not being sized large enough to hold the maximum b

[linux-usb-devel] Best src tree to use when submitting patches?

2005-08-13 Thread James Painter
What's the best source tree to use when submitting patches: Latest released version (currently 2.4.12.4), Latest prepatch (currently 2.4.13-rc6), Latest -mm patch (currently 2.6.13-rc5-mm1), Latest git snapshot (currently 2.6.13-rc6-git5), something else? It sounds to me like my asix changes wou

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usbnet problem with Dlink DUB-E100

2005-08-13 Thread James Painter
David Hollis wrote: I wonder if it might just be simpler to wrap the 'val' in cpu_to_le16 in the ax8817x_mdio_read/write functions. Would make the rest of the code cleaner and easier to follow. Pointers to these functions are set in the dev->mii structure, and must follow the ethtool_mii

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usbnet problem with Dlink DUB-E100

2005-08-12 Thread James Painter
David Hollis wrote: Interesting, I wonder if anyone else is using these devices on other PPC or like systems? I suppose they may be trying to use them but not having much success and just not reporting it. I wouldn't be too surprised if it's an endian issue, though the PHY handling has been a

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: AX88178 Driver (USB to 1000bT)

2005-08-10 Thread James Painter
For what it is worth, I have working AX88178 code for the usbnet driver I've been trying to find time to polish up to submit. I've been using it daily for several months in a backport to 2.4 for an embedded system (tivo). It's had less exercise in a 2.6 environment, but it's passed the tests

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usbnet ethernet duplex issue?

2005-06-26 Thread James Painter
David Hollis wrote: There are some patches to handle the auto-negotiation that went in 2.6.11 or 2.6.12 andthey SHOULD be handling those cases better though it is certainly possible that they don't work as well as they should. In some of my testing, I was finding that I only really got the LPA