Re: PATCH[linux-usb-devel] Firmware Frustration

2002-02-07 Thread Ken Hahn
of your machine kinda question. Hope this all helps, Ken Hahn - Original Message - From: "Richard W. Knight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ken Hahn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Greg KH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Matthew Dharm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: PATCH[linux-usb-devel] Firmware Frustration

2002-02-07 Thread Ken Hahn
of your machine kinda question. Hope this all helps, Ken Hahn - Original Message - From: "Richard W. Knight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ken Hahn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Greg KH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Matthew Dharm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Firmware Frustration

2001-12-20 Thread Ken Hahn
latest 2.4 kernel, and hopefully we can get it in the kernel from there (crosses fingers). Um, I'm on other projects now, and I'm on vacation next week. It will probably be Januaray before I get the patch worked up. I hope that helps, Ken Hahn _

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Firmware Frustration

2001-12-19 Thread Ken Hahn
Nope.. it isn't 3 lines... see below - Original Message - From: "David Brownell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ken Hahn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > The defined method involves providing a script in /etc/hotplug/usb

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Firmware Frustration

2001-12-19 Thread Ken Hahn
- Original Message - From: "David Brownell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ken Hahn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > In addition, the firmware loading aspect of the linux-hotplug is not > > solid yet (they have a program (fxloa

[linux-usb-devel] Firmware Frustration

2001-12-19 Thread Ken Hahn
ring the USB device, there ya go)   *breathing deeply*   Ok, I'm just a bit frustrated. Still appreciate all that goes on here. Thank all of you. Wish all good holiday type feelings.   Just looking for guidance,   Ken Hahn

Re: [linux-usb-devel] BACKPACK USB Adapter

2001-11-15 Thread Ken Hahn
Brad Hards wrote: > Just a thought: the place where HUB_PROBE_TRIES is used is > usb_hub_port_connect_change(), which calls usb_hub_port_reset(), which in turn > is the source of the "USB device not accepting new address" error. Could we be > falling foul of some marginal condition that is masked

Re: [linux-usb-devel] BACKPACK USB Adapter

2001-11-14 Thread Ken Hahn
Cool, I had wondered if that kinda thing could be/was done (makes much more sense), but there remains one thing to be resolved. The device still isn't recognized as I described in the last e-mail unless we up the retrys to 3. Is it possible to get that changed? Thanks, Ken Hahn Engineer,

[linux-usb-devel] BACKPACK USB Adapter

2001-11-14 Thread Ken Hahn
Howdy,Sorry this e-mail is a bit long, but hopefully I'll get all my issues in one e-mail and not have to spam the list with a bunch of questions.Last April (the fourth of April to be exact), I posted some code here that allowed a BACKPACK USB adapter to be used  under Linux.  I began to try

[linux-usb-devel] TA DA! - BACKPACK USB adapter

2001-04-04 Thread Ken Hahn
Hi, My name is Ken Hahn. I work as an Engineer at Micro Solutions (the people who make BACKPACK CD-RW's and CD-ROMS). I'm happy to be able to tell you that we are releasing source code to make our BACKPACK USB adapter work with Linux, under the GPL (attached to this e-mail). This dr