[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] usblp printer GET_DEVICE_ID fix

2004-05-22 Thread Martin Habets
my printer/scanner uses interface 1 for the printer. Best regards, Martin Habets On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 03:19:43PM +0200, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 09:27:37AM +0100, Martin Habets wrote: > > Hi Pete, > > > > I've had no response from Vojtech a

[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] usblp printer GET_DEVICE_ID fix

2004-05-19 Thread Martin Habets
my printer/scanner uses interface 1 for the printer. Best regards, Martin Habets On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 03:19:43PM +0200, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 09:27:37AM +0100, Martin Habets wrote: > > Hi Pete, > > > > I've had no response from Vojtech a

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] usblp printer GET_DEVICE_ID fix

2004-05-01 Thread Martin Habets
n Fri, 16 Apr 2004 00:35:16 +0100 > Martin Habets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There is a problem in the GET_DEVICE_ID ioctl() implementation. The patch below > > (against 2.6 current) fixes the code to be according to the official usb printer > > spec. > >

[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] usblp printer GET_DEVICE_ID fix

2004-04-15 Thread Martin Habets
/scanner uses interface 1 for the printer. Also attached is parts of kern.log before and after the patch. Best regards, Martin Habets - Part of kern.log: Apr 1 19:09:55 palantir8 kernel: usb 1-2: new full speed USB device using address 3 Apr 1 19:09:55 palantir8 kernel: usb 1-2: new device

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] Do not wait for release of unclaimed interface (2.6.5-rc2)

2004-04-05 Thread Martin Habets
own? (with out the patch I guess). If so, would you recommend I do that on 2.6.5-rc2 or current? I'm kinda scared I'll end up in sysfs and/or the counter stuff (yes, that would be scary to me). Thanks, Martin Habets ---