Hi.
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 21:36 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > But you're still likely to run into trouble if you unplug a storage
> > > device, move it to another system and write on it, then plug it back into
> > > the original system. The PLVM would somehow have to recognize that th
Hi.
On Friday 28 April 2006 05:21, David Brownell wrote:
> On Thursday 27 April 2006 9:55 am, Patrick Mochel wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:34:16AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > During swsusp the system is
> > > supposed to be completely off, with no suspend power available. Hen
Hi.
On Thursday 27 April 2006 00:24, Alan Stern wrote:
> A little behind the current head of the thread, but better late than
> never...
:)
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2006, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > > (7) (without your change) swsusp calls .suspend() for all device
> > >
Hi.
On Wednesday 26 April 2006 13:32, David Brownell wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 April 2006 6:16 pm, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Wednesday 26 April 2006 09:55, David Brownell wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 25 April 2006 3:18 pm, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> >
Hi.
On Wednesday 26 April 2006 09:55, David Brownell wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 April 2006 3:18 pm, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > I saw the 2 suspends, 1 resume comment in another part of the thread, but
> > don't believe a driver would be able to detect that 2 suspends and 1
>
Hi.
On Wednesday 26 April 2006 08:06, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 April 2006 23:03, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > On Wednesday 26 April 2006 06:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 25 April 2006 22:28, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday
Hi.
On Wednesday 26 April 2006 06:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday 25 April 2006 22:28, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > On Wednesday 26 April 2006 04:56, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > You're saying that (9) is wrong, so could you please suggest w
Hi.
On Wednesday 26 April 2006 04:56, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> You're saying that (9) is wrong, so could you please suggest what to do
> instead of it?
'scuse me for butting in, but here's my suggested modified version:
> Well, suppose we have a modular driver that's not loaded before resume.
Hi.
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 08:47, David Brownell wrote:
> On Monday 24 April 2006 2:47 pm, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > I agree with this change but I think it'll cause some strange things to
> > happen for some time.
>
> Let's see. :) I think it's less likely to be drivers with broken
> shutd
Hi David.
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 07:29, David Brownell wrote:
> I've noticed a bunch of problem reports that go like this:
>
> - boot system with some USB devices attached
> - echo disk > /sys/power/state
> - ... later resume ...
> - now those USB devices don't work right
> - unplug them/re
Hi again.
Three replies to one message! Oh dear!
I often suggest people try swsusp when they have a problem with
Suspend2. It helps discern whether Suspend2 is broken or the driver is
doing something wrong. I don sack cloth and ashes as I confess that I
failed to take my own medicine. I tried sws
Hi again.
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 13:49, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
>
> > Hi Ben.
> >
> > On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 09:15, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 08:04 +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > &
Hi Alan.
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 13:49, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
>
> > Hi Ben.
> >
> > On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 09:15, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 08:04 +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > &
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 12:05, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > It's a suspend to disk cycle or to ram ? Do you get those IRQs when you
> > > move the mouse or all the time ? What is irq 99 normally on your
> > > system ?
>
> Well, I'm not sure what that "vector 99" thing is, it's x86 world, migh
Hi Ben.
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 09:15, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 08:04 +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Originally sent to LKML, but Greg said this is the place...
> >
> > I have a HT box with USB mouse support built as m
Hi.
Originally sent to LKML, but Greg said this is the place...
I have a HT box with USB mouse support built as modules. Beginning with
2.6.15-rc5 (maybe slightly earlier) a suspend/resume cycle makes the USB
mouse get in an invalid state, such that I get a gazillion messages in
the logs saying "
if we can say "I'm rebooting rather than
powering off."
> So in theory, with cpufreq, we could stop userspace, ->halt every device
> (drivers won't do anything if they know it's not necessary), change the
> frequency, and then resume operation.
That looks like a
i_set_power_state(chip->pci, PCI_D0);
pci_set_master(chip->pci);
snd_atiixp_aclink_reset(chip);
diff -ruNp 840-combined-pm_message_t-patch.patch-old/sound/pci/atiixp_modem.c
840-combined-pm_message_t-patch.patch-new/sound/pci/atiixp_modem.c
--- 840-combined-pm_message_t-patch.
eek.
> It's fun and FREE -- well, almosthttp://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
> ___
> linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
--
Nigel
19 matches
Mail list logo
