[linux-usb-devel] Re: done_head LSB broken in SA1111 ohci implementation

2005-04-13 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
Please don't cross-post between linux-usb-devel and linux-arm-kernel. Linux-arm-kernel is a subscriber only list, and therefore replies by linux-usb-devel folk will cause them to receive moderation messages, which can upset people. --- SF email

[linux-usb-devel] Re: schedule_timeout problem with usb.c in 2.4.18 on ARM

2003-09-22 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 02:02:38AM -0700, Pier Paolo Glave wrote: > After a long session of debugging with printk, I found > out that in those cases one of the calls to > schedule_timeout() (issued when waiting for an URB > response in usb.c) never returns. > I can avoid this situation by removing

[linux-usb-devel] Re: PCI/USB consustent_alloc assertion violation.

2002-07-09 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 05:05:07PM -0700, Pering, Trevor wrote: > Hello -- this is a re-post of an earlier problem from last week I'm still > working on. The problem is consistent_alloc(). When it was written, it didn't need to handle allocations from interrupts. However, the spec changed, and

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] SA-1111 support for ohci-hcd

2002-06-05 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 03:17:10PM -0700, Christopher Hoover wrote: > [PATCH] SA- support for ohci-hcd > > This patch is a first cut at SA- support for ohci-hcd. It seems > to limp along OK. > > I intentionally tried to change as little as possible for this first > cut. Therefore the o