On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote:
>
> [...]
>> The initrd "linuxrc" file that loads the modules is here. One can see
>> the order in which the modules are loaded. We had to make our own shell
>&g
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On 3/15/07, linux-os (Dick Johnson) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> echo "Loading uhci-hcd.ko module"
>> insmod /lib/uhci-hcd.ko
>> echo "Loading ehci-hcd.ko module"
>> insmod /lib/ehci-hcd.ko
>
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
>> On 3/15/07, linux-os (Dick Johnson) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> echo "Loading uhci-hcd.ko module"
>>> insmod /lib/uhci-hcd.ko
>>> echo "Loa
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote:
>
>>>> Ouch! I can't do anything by copy from a screen! There is no way to get
>>>> `dmesg` without the keyboard! That's why I sent a request to
>>>&g
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> (added linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net to CC)
>
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote:
>
>>>> I have multiple AMD 64-bit servers in several configurations, with
>>>> several different motherb
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this implements suspend support for usblp. According to the CUPS people
> ENODEV will make CUPS retry the job. Thus it is returned in the runtime
> case. My printer survives suspend/resume cycles with it.
>
> Regards
> Oliver
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 1. Juni 2006 17:09 schrieb linux-os (Dick Johnson):
>> Many, most, perhaps all such devices don't take more power when they
>> are "enabled". Everything is already running and sucking up maximum
>>
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 01 Jun 2006 02:18:20 -0700
>> David Liontooth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Starting with 2.6.16, some USB devices fail unnecessarily on unpowered
>>> hubs. Alan Stern explains,
>>>
>>> "The idea is
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
>> Am Dienstag, 6. Dezember 2005 21:13 schrieb Eduardo Pereira Habkost:
>>> Anyway, I don't see yet why the atomic_t would make the code slower on
>>> non-smp. Is atomic_add_unless(v, 1, 1) supposed to be slower th
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005, Paul Jackson wrote:
> Alan asked:
>> But why do people go to the
>> effort of confusing readers by using "^" instead of "!="?
>
> My guess - eor (^) was quicker than not-equal (!=) on a PDP-11.
>
> That code fragment for checking uid's has been around a -long-
> time, if my m
10 matches
Mail list logo
