Wouter Van Hemel <wouter <at> pair.com> writes: > Very constructive. If you would use this zealotry energy in getting > results from Philips, we might not be here arguing. I get the feeling some > seem to think of the removal of this popular driver as a *contribution* to > Linux. This attitude contributes nothing to Linux. If you don't like a > partially binary driver, then I suggest you, too, contact Philips instead > of turning on your own users and contributors, or fighting with driver > maintainers that simply can't change the world to fit your wishes. We are > all in this mess, we all want good working drivers, preferably opensource.
word! screwing up with artists isnt what it should be about but constructiveness. _purge and prune_ may have been the right thing from documentation and guide lines but i bet there would have been a way to make both sides happy, us that do want a decompressor and those that dont care about it. i'm not that much into kernel hacking but there sure might be a way to have these two modules (pwc and pwcx) act happily together without violating kernel guide lines. and there is yet another popular driver that is closed source. i hope you dont screw up on them as you did to nemosoft. cheers, mark anthony ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
