On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 02:38:43AM -0800, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
> Olaf Hering wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 07, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Have your customer try that (If you want me to regen the patch for you,
> >>let me know, but that should be simple enough to just mod the patch),
> >>and if it wo
Olaf Hering wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
Have your customer try that (If you want me to regen the patch for you,
let me know, but that should be simple enough to just mod the patch),
and if it works, I'll submit it to Greg.
I havent heard back from him yet. Thats what I have in cv
On Mon, Feb 07, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
> Have your customer try that (If you want me to regen the patch for you,
> let me know, but that should be simple enough to just mod the patch),
> and if it works, I'll submit it to Greg.
I havent heard back from him yet. Thats what I have in cvs.
Signed-of
Olaf Hering wrote:
On Tue, Feb 01, Olaf Hering wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
Okay, lets try this again, shall we?
UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x054c, 0x002c, 0x0601, 0x0601,
"Sony",
"USB Floppy Drive",
US_SC_DEVICE, US_PR_DEVICE, NULL,
US_FL_SINGLE_LUN ),
Unfortunatel
On Tue, Feb 01, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
>
> > Okay, lets try this again, shall we?
> >
> > UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x054c, 0x002c, 0x0601, 0x0601,
> > "Sony",
> > "USB Floppy Drive",
> > US_SC_DEVICE, US_PR_DEVICE, NULL,
> > US_FL_SINGLE_
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:21:04PM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
>
> > Okay, lets try this again, shall we?
> >
> > UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x054c, 0x002c, 0x0601, 0x0601,
> > "Sony",
> > "USB Floppy Drive",
> > US_SC_DEVICE, US_PR_DEVICE, NULL,
>
On Mon, Jan 31, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
> Okay, lets try this again, shall we?
>
> UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x054c, 0x002c, 0x0601, 0x0601,
> "Sony",
> "USB Floppy Drive",
> US_SC_DEVICE, US_PR_DEVICE, NULL,
> US_FL_SINGLE_LUN ),
>
Unfortunately, I dont have the revision numbe
Alan Stern wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
Anyway, a revision number of 6.01, would be a deviceid of 600.
No, it would be 0x0601 (hex, not decimal, plus you have a typo). Also,
calling it a "deviceid" is confusing at best since that word could just as
easily refer to the idProdu
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
> Anyway, a revision number of 6.01, would be a deviceid of 600.
No, it would be 0x0601 (hex, not decimal, plus you have a typo). Also,
calling it a "deviceid" is confusing at best since that word could just as
easily refer to the idProduct field. Altho
Olaf Hering wrote:
This floppy needs the multilun flag, like all the other listed Sony
devices. I'm not sure about the Revision tag, how do I handle 6.01? I
dont have the /proc/bus/usb/devices output from the customer.
Olaf,
Sorry to take so long to write back, the 9am - 4am hours at work are
takin
This floppy needs the multilun flag, like all the other listed Sony
devices. I'm not sure about the Revision tag, how do I handle 6.01? I
dont have the /proc/bus/usb/devices output from the customer.
<4>Linux version 2.6.8-24.10-default ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.4
(pre 3.3.5 20040
11 matches
Mail list logo
