On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:40:58 -0400 (EDT)
> Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Patch 3 is much more experimental than the first two, and probably also
> > more controversial (I expect David will have a lot to say about it, even
> > if no one e
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:40:58 -0400 (EDT)
Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Patch 3 is much more experimental than the first two, and probably also
> more controversial (I expect David will have a lot to say about it, even
> if no one else does). In fact, I won't even CC: Andrew on this on
Hi,
On Monday, 25 September 2006 21:40, Alan Stern wrote:
> Greg and Andrew:
>
> This series of patches completely reworks the way ohci-hcd carries out
> root-hub autosuspends. The existing code is not compatible with the new
> core USB autosuspend mechanism.
>
> Patch 1 is a simple one-line
Greg and Andrew:
This series of patches completely reworks the way ohci-hcd carries out
root-hub autosuspends. The existing code is not compatible with the new
core USB autosuspend mechanism.
Patch 1 is a simple one-line change to usbcore with no harmful effects.
It can go directly into both
