Hi,
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 06:04:03PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > Also you seem to have applied the maintainer change (scanner.h +
> > scanner.c) only for 2.4 and not for 2.5?
> >
> > While I'm talking about scanner.h: Is the separated include file for
> > the ioctls also necessary in 2.5?
>
> I
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 10:25:14AM +0100, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 01:03:50AM +0100, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> > This patch prints the vendor + product ids of the scanner after it has
> > been successfully detected.
> >
> > Also the annoying error messag
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 01:03:50AM +0100, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> This patch prints the vendor + product ids of the scanner after it has
> been successfully detected.
>
> Also the annoying error message about "Scanner device is already open"
> was downgraded to a dbg. Scanning for devi
Hi,
This patch prints the vendor + product ids of the scanner after it has
been successfully detected.
Also the annoying error message about "Scanner device is already open"
was downgraded to a dbg. Scanning for devices while one scanner device
was open produced several 100 error messages in sysl
