Re: [linux-usb-devel] [patch]Re: autosuspend for HID devices, take #2

2007-05-25 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 04:20 schrieb Alan Stern: On Thu, 24 May 2007, Greg KH wrote: On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 06:25:36PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: Am Mittwoch, 23. Mai 2007 17:42 schrieb Alan Stern: On Wed, 23 May 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote: That gives me an idea.

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [patch]Re: autosuspend for HID devices, take #2

2007-05-24 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 06:25:36PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: Am Mittwoch, 23. Mai 2007 17:42 schrieb Alan Stern: On Wed, 23 May 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote: That gives me an idea. Resumption of a device has to be done in task context. So if I allocate a private freezable work queue

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [patch]Re: autosuspend for HID devices, take #2

2007-05-24 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Greg KH wrote: On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 06:25:36PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: Am Mittwoch, 23. Mai 2007 17:42 schrieb Alan Stern: On Wed, 23 May 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote: That gives me an idea. Resumption of a device has to be done in task context. So if I

[linux-usb-devel] [patch]Re: autosuspend for HID devices, take #2

2007-05-23 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Mittwoch, 23. Mai 2007 17:42 schrieb Alan Stern: On Wed, 23 May 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote: That gives me an idea. Resumption of a device has to be done in task context. So if I allocate a private freezable work queue for HID resumption, the freezer would guard against illicit