Hello,
Have anyone ever made AX88772 usb ethernet driver working on a big endian
system? I notice that some talk about the big-endian issue on maillist, but I
don't know if the axis driver work well on big endian system of the
linux-2.6.20-rc6.
I'm using the linksys USB200M ver2.1 adapter on Pow
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 18:50 +0800, Liu Dave-r63238 wrote:
> Hello,
> Have anyone ever made AX88772 usb ethernet driver working on a big endian
> system? I notice that some talk about the big-endian issue on maillist, but I
> don't know if the axis driver work well on big endian system of the
> lin
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 11:47 -0500, David Hollis wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 18:50 +0800, Liu Dave-r63238 wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Have anyone ever made AX88772 usb ethernet driver working on a big endian
> > system? I notice that some talk about the big-endian issue on maillist, but
> > I
> > don'
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 12:03 +0800, Dave Liu wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 11:47 -0500, David Hollis wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 18:50 +0800, Liu Dave-r63238 wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > Have anyone ever made AX88772 usb ethernet driver working on a big endian
> > > system? I notice that some tal
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 13:33 +0800, Dave Liu wrote:
> David,
> I have the other LINKSYS USB200M NIC adapter, which chipset is AX88172
> and PHY RTL8201. I can ping successfully with it in linux-2.6.20-rc6 on
> big-endian system, I noticed the AX88772 have on-chip PHY inside. so I
> feel the problem
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 07:38 -0500, David Hollis wrote:
> If the AX88172 device seemed to work fine, that at least narrows it
> down. Most of the code is shared between the two except for the bind()
> calls and probably the multicast function. I'd be interested to know if
> the AX88178 (1GB Ether
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 10:47 -0500, David Hollis wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 07:38 -0500, David Hollis wrote:
>
> > If the AX88172 device seemed to work fine, that at least narrows it
> > down. Most of the code is shared between the two except for the bind()
> > calls and probably the multicast
On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 10:38 +0800, Dave Liu wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 10:47 -0500, David Hollis wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 07:38 -0500, David Hollis wrote:
> >
> > > If the AX88172 device seemed to work fine, that at least narrows it
> > > down. Most of the code is shared between the t
On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 10:40 -0500, David Hollis wrote:
[snip]
> Great to hear. Now we just need to figure out that memory allocation
> issue in usbnet.
Yes, could you have a look the memory allocation issue in usbnet? TIA.
Dave
