Re: [linux-usb-devel] Artificial limits in usbfs

2006-05-16 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 03:00:52PM -0700, Micah Dowty wrote: > I would submit that it isn't the usbfs layer's job to > enforce the USB spec. There are two reasons for this: > > - Some USB devices are broken, and it should still be > possible to write drivers for them on Linux- even > user-spac

[linux-usb-devel] Artificial limits in usbfs

2006-05-16 Thread Micah Dowty
Hi, Some months ago I raised my concerns about artificial limits in usbfs, by submitting two very simple patches: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.usb.devel/40811 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.usb.devel/40812 The issue hasn't been resolved yet, so I'd like to briefly restate the point